 |
|
| ActiveWin: Reviews | Active Network | New Reviews | Old Reviews | Interviews |Mailing List | Forums |
|
|
|
|
|
DirectX |
|
ActiveMac |
|
Downloads |
|
Forums |
|
Interviews |
|
News |
|
MS Games & Hardware |
|
Reviews |
|
Support Center |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows Server 2003 |
|
Windows Vista |
|
Windows XP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
Apple/Mac |
|
Xbox |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveXBox |
|
Xbox News |
|
Box Shots |
|
Inside The Xbox |
|
Released Titles |
|
Announced Titles |
|
Screenshots/Videos |
|
History Of The Xbox |
|
Links |
|
Forum |
|
FAQ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Windows XP |
|
Introduction |
|
System Requirements |
|
Home Features |
|
Pro Features |
|
Upgrade Checklists |
|
History |
|
FAQ |
|
Links |
|
TopTechTips |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows Vista |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows Server 2002 |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
Xbox 360 |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveDVD |
|
DVD News |
|
DVD Forum |
|
Glossary |
|
Tips |
|
Articles |
|
Reviews |
|
News Archive |
|
Links |
|
Drivers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Xbox/Games |
|
Fallout 3 |
|
|
|
Applications |
|
Windows Server 2008 R2 |
|
Windows 7 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
iPod Touch 32GB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Interviews |
|
Steve Ballmer |
|
Jim Allchin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
News Archive |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
|
Product: AMD Athlon 64 3800 |
3D Mark 2005 Benchmarks
| Table Of Contents |
| 1: Introduction 2: Setup and Components 3: More Details 4: Installation 5: Windows Performance 6: Half Life 2 7: Doom 3 8: Farcry 9: X2: The Threat 10: 3D Mark 2005 11: PC Mark 2004 12: Conclusion |
While not the best program to tell you how well your machine performance is in real world gaming terms, the benchmark is well used across all the internet and in magazines nowadays. As you can see, as expected the overall 3D Mark score is not much higher on the 4000 than the 38000processor, this is simply due to them both using an identical graphics card, the strange part of this test is that the CPU test showed a drop when using the 4000+ processor against the 3800+, I can't explain this one as I ran the test multiple times and couldn't get much better marks, but in saying that, as usual 3D Mark 2005 is best left for 3D benchmarking, not CPU testing.
3D Mark 2005 at 1024x768x32 - 3D Mark Overall Score
|
CPU
|
Mark
|
| AMD Athlon 64 3800+ |
5921
|
| AMD Athlon 64 4000+ |
6044 |
3D Mark 2005 at 1024x768x32 - CPU Score
|
CPU
|
Mark
|
| AMD Athlon 64 3800+ |
5236
|
| AMD Athlon 64 4000+ |
4806 |
