The Active Network

Layout and usability present themselves in good manners the only think I’d have to point out here is that a watches page will open in a new tab and that’s not what I like to see. best replica handbags You will not like the outcome for sure.rolex replica uses us I would not go for “huge” but definitely a place where you will find most of the variations you’d be looking for. leaderwatches.5-carat opal ring.” fake watches he deserved the opulence he maintained in his lifetime. replica watches The signature “Francesco” ablaze in white over the black paint of the bike’s tank was the main attraction or the mere fact that the bike is owned by the Pope in the first place.fake watches This Rolex GMT Master II is one of the good looking replica watches I’ve reviewed lately As you know I’m not one of the biggest Rolex replica watches lover as I prefer bigger cases on my watches and some slightly different looks. Tags: Knock off tag heuer Breguet replica watches,cn because of the.

ActiveWin: Reviews Active Network | New Reviews | Old Reviews | Interviews |Mailing List | Forums 
 

Amazon.com

  *  


Product: AMD Athlon 64 3800
Company: AMD
Website: http://www.amd.com
Estimated Street Price: $500
Review By: Byron Hinson

3D Mark 2005 Benchmarks

Table Of Contents
1: Introduction
2: Setup and Components
3: More Details
4: Installation
5: Windows Performance
6: Half Life 2
7: Doom 3
8: Farcry
9: X2: The Threat
10: 3D Mark 2005
11: PC Mark 2004

12: Conclusion

While not the best program to tell you how well your machine performance is in real world gaming terms, the benchmark is well used across all the internet and in magazines nowadays. As you can see, as expected the overall 3D Mark score is not much higher on the 4000 than the 38000processor, this is simply due to them both using an identical graphics card, the strange part of this test is that the CPU test showed a drop when using the 4000+ processor against the 3800+, I can't explain this one as I ran the test multiple times and couldn't get much better marks, but in saying that, as usual 3D Mark 2005 is best left for 3D benchmarking, not CPU testing.

3D Mark 2005 at 1024x768x32 - 3D Mark Overall Score

CPU
Mark
AMD Athlon 64 3800+
5921
AMD Athlon 64 4000+

6044

 

3D Mark 2005 at 1024x768x32 - CPU Score

CPU
Mark
AMD Athlon 64 3800+
5236
AMD Athlon 64 4000+

4806

 

 « X2: The Threat PC Mark 2004 »

 

  *  
  *   *