| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Compare Microsoft .NET to J2EE Technology | |
|
||
| Time: 12:50 EST/17:50 GMT | News Source: ActiveWin.com | Posted By: Robert Stein | ||
|
This paper presents the results of a comprehensive performance benchmark of Web application development technologies based on the Doculabs-developed Nile @Bench benchmark. Specifically, we discuss the results of benchmarking the Nile application as implemented in Microsoft .NET using C# vs. the latest version of a leading J2EE-based application server product from a top-tier ISV. The paper also presents detailed performance information comparing the performance of the .NET/C# Nile application to verions implemented in Microsoft Active Server Pages with Visual Basic 6.0 COM+ components, and Microsoft ISAPI using Visual C++ 7.0 ATL Server technology. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 147 Last | Next |
The time now is
12:00:45 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 15916 (63.106.91.80) at 4/16/2003 1:42:50 PM |
| This is old news. The paper was produced in October 2001! |
| #2 By 7390 (198.246.16.251) at 4/16/2003 2:03:48 PM |
| so is Java/J2EE |
| #3 By 3653 (63.162.177.140) at 4/16/2003 2:53:10 PM |
| SLAM! |
| #4 By 20 (67.9.179.51) at 4/17/2003 12:51:33 AM |
|
#4 See you in 2 years :)
Meanwhile, I'll have gone through 3 revisions of my site and added 3x the features while your business goes under. Smart move! |
| #5 By 7390 (198.246.16.251) at 4/17/2003 10:55:18 AM |
|
"#4 See you in 2 years :) " and that is just for hello world.
I haven't worked much with Java but I have no intentions of giving up .NET |
| #6 By 2332 (65.221.182.2) at 4/18/2003 1:44:05 AM |
|
#7 - "Actually, if I follow this path (it was a bit tongue and cheek)... we'll have the SAME features in 2-3 years, but mine will just run 10x more efficiently."
10x more efficiently? I'm sure some C++ code runs 10x more efficiently than some .NET code, but the same is also true for the reverse. For instance, in C++, you need to manage all your memory by yourself... and I can guaruntee that Microsoft's algorythms for memory management are a lot better than what you'd be willing to write for your application. Take the typical C++ object with a memory footprint of say, 2k. Create that object 1,000,000. Good. Now I'll do the same in C#... only mine will almost certainly create those million objects in FAR less time than your C++ app. Why? Because .NET's memory management is very advanced, and can allocate that memory a lot more efficiently than you with your mallocs. :-) "Tell me... what thing is so hard to do from C++... what C# or Java library does something there there is no C library or C++ class system to do? Really, I'd like to know." Well, it's not really a question of hard versus easy, although I could pretty easily show you 3 lines of .NET code that does the same thing as 100 lines of C++ code, even with the best libraries. Something being "hard" is really an assesment not of the technology, but of the programmer. The advantage that managed environments give you is that you don't have to worry about the plumbing. Not writing your own plumbing means that you don't have to debug it either. This means that there is less likely to be bugs in your code. (Since there is a lot less code!) So, not only can I develop applications a LOT faster in C# than I can in C++ (and yes, I know C++ just fine, thanks), but those applications will be less error prone, and consequently, more secure and robust. Also, there are some things you can't do in C++ (non-.NET C++, of course)... at least, not without many YEARS of development and research. Things like code access security. Could you write your own stack walker / validator, along with a complete evidence system? I suppose. But you'll be fired before you ever even begin your hello world program. You remind me of those assembly developers who critized C as being too abstract and rough. Anything you can do in C, we can do in assembly, and faster! Well, perhaps... but if that's your argument, you've completely missed the point. |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 147 Last | Next |
The time now is
12:00:45 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
