I wasn't impressed when the settlement terms in the Microsoft antitrust case were merely "proposed," a little less than one year ago, so it shouldn't be hard to predict my reaction to the pair of rulings that finally came down this past Friday evening.
In short words, the company broke the law--and got away with it. It's been a while, I know, since the Court of Appeals upheld the original trial's Findings of Fact, sending only the question of appropriate remedy back to the lower court for reconsideration. But as I noted at the time, one of the crucial questions was whether Microsoft could freely stifle potential competing technologies without abusing its monopoly powers. The company claimed that the very novelty of alternative platforms, such as the Java-enabled browser, kept them from being part of the market in which Microsoft's monopoly exists.
|