|
|
User Controls
|
New User
|
Login
|
Edit/View My Profile
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac
|
Articles
|
Forums
|
Links
|
News
|
News Search
|
Reviews
|
|
|
|
News Centers
|
Windows/Microsoft
|
DVD
|
ActiveHardware
|
Xbox
|
MaINTosh
|
News Search
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats
|
The Lobby
|
Special Events Room
|
Developer's Lounge
|
XBox Chat
|
|
|
|
FAQ's
|
Windows 98/98 SE
|
Windows 2000
|
Windows Me
|
Windows "Whistler" XP
|
Windows CE
|
Internet Explorer 6
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
Xbox
|
DirectX
|
DVD's
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips
|
Registry Tips
|
Windows 95/98
|
Windows 2000
|
Internet Explorer 4
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
Windows NT Tips
|
Program Tips
|
Easter Eggs
|
Hardware
|
DVD
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews
|
Applications
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002
|
|
Hardware
|
Intel Personal Audio Player
3000
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse
Explorer
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info
|
About This Site
|
Affiliates
|
ANet Forums
|
Contact Us
|
Default Home Page
|
Link To Us
|
Links
|
Member Pages
|
Site Search
|
Awards
|
|
|
|
Credits
©1997/2004, Active Network. All
Rights Reserved.
Layout & Design by
Designer Dream. Content
written by the Active Network team. Please click
here for full terms of
use and restrictions or read our
Privacy Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time:
07:34 EST/12:34 GMT | News Source:
ActiveWin.com |
Posted By: Robert Stein |
- MS09-063
Vulnerability in Web Services on Devices API Could Allow Remote Code Execution (973565)
This security update resolves a privately reported vulnerability in the Web Services on Devices Application Programming Interface (WSDAPI) on the Windows operating system. The vulnerability could allow remote code execution if an affected Windows system receives a specially crafted packet. Only attackers on the local subnet would be able to exploit this vulnerability.
- MS09-064
Vulnerability in License Logging Server Could Allow Remote Code Execution (974783)
This security update resolves a privately reported vulnerability in Microsoft Windows 2000. The vulnerability could allow remote code execution if an attacker sent a specially crafted network message to a computer running the License Logging Server. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could take complete control of the system. Firewall best practices and standard default firewall configurations can help protect networks from attacks that originate outside the enterprise perimeter.
- MS09-065
Vulnerabilities in Windows Kernel-Mode Drivers Could Allow Remote Code Execution (969947)
This security update resolves several privately reported vulnerabilities in the Windows kernel. The most severe of the vulnerabilities could allow remote code execution if a user viewed content rendered in a specially crafted Embedded OpenType (EOT) font. In a Web-based attack scenario, an attacker would have to host a Web site that contains specially crafted embedded fonts that are used to attempt to exploit this vulnerability. In addition, compromised Web sites and Web sites that accept or host user-provided content could contain specially crafted content that could exploit this vulnerability. An attacker would have no way to force users to visit a specially crafted Web site. Instead, an attacker would have to convince the user to visit the Web site, typically by getting them to click a link in an e-mail message or Instant Messenger message that takes the user to the attacker's site.
- MS09-066
Vulnerability in Active Directory Could Allow Denial of Service (973309)
This security update resolves a privately reported vulnerability in Active Directory directory service, Active Directory Application Mode (ADAM), and Active Directory Lightweight Directory Service (AD LDS). The vulnerability could allow denial of service if stack space was exhausted during execution of certain types of LDAP or LDAPS requests. This vulnerability only affects domain controllers and systems configured to run ADAM or AD LDS.
- MS09-067
Vulnerabilities in Microsoft Office Excel Could Allow Remote Code Execution (972652)
This security update resolves several privately reported vulnerabilities in Microsoft Office Excel. The vulnerabilities could allow remote code execution if a user opens a specially crafted Excel file. An attacker who successfully exploited any of these vulnerabilities could gain the same user rights as the local user. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than users who operate with administrative user rights.
- MS09-068
Vulnerability in Microsoft Office Word Could Allow Remote Code Execution (976307)
This security update resolves a privately reported vulnerability that could allow remote code execution if a user opens a specially crafted Word file. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could take complete control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than users who operate with administrative user rights.
|
|
#1 By
15406 (216.191.227.68)
at
11/11/2009 8:19:49 AM
|
MS09-065 appears to be a real doozy:
'The Windows kernel vulnerability is going to take the cake,' said Andrew Storms, director of security operations at nCircle Network Security. 'The attack vector can be driven through Internet Explorer, and this is one of those instances where the user won't be notified or prompted. This is absolutely a drive-by attack scenario.' Richie Lai, the director of vulnerability research at security company Qualys, agreed. 'Anyone running IE [Internet Explorer] is at risk here, even though the flaw is not in the browser, but in the Win32k kernel mode driver.'
Strange. I've been told by MS experts that this stuff doesn't happen anymore. "The new Windows won't have the same problems as the old Windows. Trust me.", they said.
I think I'll stick with Firefox and NoScript.
|
#2 By
23275 (68.117.163.128)
at
11/11/2009 8:41:40 AM
|
Latch,
Please, at least make it a little harder for me....
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS09-065.mspx
Non-Affected Software
Windows 7 for 32-bit Systems
Windows 7 for x64-based Systems
Windows Server 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems
Windows Server 2008 R2 for Itanium-based Systems
For Windows Vista and WS08, especially x64, the BUG is only listed as important and ONLY when address space could be isolated (which is random, by the way), would one need to be concerned (Ref ASLR+DEP+NX, or hardware zero execute (defaults, by the way)).
If you stick with Firefox and Noscript, fine, they will not be what is keeping you safer - Windows will be (provided you haven't turned off its protections.)
Finally Latch, why persist in trying to confuse people? Why not encourage them to consider moving off of XP and onto something else - including Windows 7, or some other OS?
|
#3 By
15406 (216.191.227.68)
at
11/11/2009 8:49:31 AM
|
#2: Non-Affected Software, Windows 7 for 32-bit Systems, Windows 7 for x64-based Systems
Whew. Good thing for the 2% of the world running those OSes. The other 98%? Ummmm........
|
#4 By
23275 (68.117.163.128)
at
11/11/2009 8:59:42 AM
|
Latch, you said: Strange. I've been told by MS experts that this stuff doesn't happen anymore
The answer is clearly that, NO THIS STUFF DOES NOT HAPPEN ANYMORE! Not since Windows Vista shipped three years ago.
The relevance of your arguments is dated and aging more rapidly as each day passes.
|
#5 By
89249 (64.207.240.90)
at
11/11/2009 9:26:02 AM
|
Ok, now Latch. Lets give Mac and Linux their due. Linux, after a decade, has wrangled 1% market share after 10 "Years of Linux". And Apple has, after providing computers in every school, movie, and tv show, has managed to grab 6%. Many numbers have also put Vista install at 14% even after the most vile FUD campaign I've ever seen. So to correct your statement.
Whew. Good thing for 15% of the world running those OSes. The other 78%? Ummm........
Seriously, usually you show Linux more respect. I know it's not much but you go on and be proud of that 1%! UBUNTU HAS LANDED!
|
#6 By
15406 (216.191.227.68)
at
11/11/2009 11:16:33 AM
|
#4: The answer is clearly that, NO THIS STUFF DOES NOT HAPPEN ANYMORE! Not since Windows Vista shipped three years ago.
So, if what you're saying is correct, then MS just patched a bug that doesn't exist? And these two researchers from notable security companies are talking about something that didn't happen? Now I *am* confused.
#5: Huh? Ketchum and I were discussing a major vulnerability in Windows and you show up with your pecker out about OS market share?
|
#7 By
28801 (65.90.202.10)
at
11/11/2009 11:38:03 AM
|
Latch, you are the one who brougt up market share:
Whew. Good thing for the 2% of the world running those OSes. The other 98%? "Ummmm........ "
Pecker and all...
|
#8 By
15406 (216.191.227.68)
at
11/11/2009 11:52:23 AM
|
#7: Ketchum was trying to portray the bug as insignificant because it wasn't able to affect Win7. I pointed out that Win7 only has a 2% market share so 98% of Win users need to be concerned. Nowhere was I contrasting market share of Win vs Linux vs Mac. Yes, Win has the largest market share. Nobody is arguing otherwise. It's not relevant to this thread.
|
#9 By
16797 (65.93.27.121)
at
11/11/2009 12:07:20 PM
|
#8 You said: "The new Windows won't have the same problems as the old Windows. Trust me.", they said."
In response, Lloyd simply pointed that it indeed does not affect Win 7 or 2008 R2...
You can deny it now by arguing something completely different (Win 7's market share, etc).
|
#10 By
15406 (216.191.227.68)
at
11/11/2009 1:18:24 PM
|
#9: OK, now I get it. I can admit when I miss the forest for the trees. In the narrow context of this thread and that particular bug, Ketchum's right and I'm wrong. Or at least until the next bug of this kind comes around that does hit Win7, and it is inevitable.
|
#11 By
16797 (70.48.179.251)
at
11/11/2009 2:00:48 PM
|
Aha, you're not talking about MS09-065, even though that is how you started your first message here.. so what precisely is your point then? That Win 7 is not more secure then previous versions of Windows because there are bugs in Win 7?
|
#12 By
15406 (216.191.227.68)
at
11/11/2009 2:04:39 PM
|
#11: Yes, I started off talking about MS09-065 but had forgotten that it didn't apply to 7. When Ketchum reminded me of this, I thought he was doing his trick of advocating a configuration that hardly anyone in the world has. I pointed out that his solution doesn't help 98% of the Windows world, but didn't see that he wasn't proposing a solution as much as he was proving me wrong about "new" Windows being the exact same as "old" Windows. It was a case of me arguing what I thought he said based on historical perspective rather than what it was that he actually meant.
|
#13 By
89249 (64.207.240.90)
at
11/11/2009 2:40:50 PM
|
you show up with your pecker out about OS market share
Nevermind the fact I modified one of your statements. I'm fairly certain that would have shown the context that I came in to jab at you about market share.
You must be a fun person to hang out with lol!
|
#14 By
15406 (216.191.227.68)
at
11/11/2009 4:00:39 PM
|
#13: I'm fairly certain that would have shown the context that I came in to jab at you about market share.
Honestly, there's never been much substance to most of your posts that I can remember, so I never got past the first line where you were going on about OS market share. That's not what this thread was about, and I assumed that you were looking to tweak my nose about Windows' dominant share after misinterpreting my 2% comment as a slam against Win7.
You must be a fun person to hang out with lol!
For your information, I'm a handsome, funny, sincere, genial laff-riot. Humble, too. I understand that those people who are psychically married to Microsoft will not like me very much but that's partisanship in a nutshell, isn't it?
|
#15 By
89249 (72.213.157.190)
at
11/11/2009 11:37:18 PM
|
Latch I generally make fun of you because your view of markets and economics is laughable at best (my favorite lately was your description of depreciation as compound interest). Having a logical debate with you is a waste of time. I learned that long ago and enjoy watching others continue to try. Anybody who disagrees with you is an MS Fanboy. Personal Choice is irrelevant because people are stupid. All companies exist and thrive only by screwing their customers. Standards bodies will save the world from proprietary monsters. Linux is a step away from owning the desktop market (just one more Year). Nothing Microsoft produces is secure.
What's funny is I have these conversations with younger people regurgitating the same crap you push. Standards will save us all even though my grandpa could push out a new HTML standard faster than the W3C. I've been reading about the "Open Source movement" which has yet to add real value to software other than producing a free version of something that was researched and fine tuned by other companies years ago. Hell, in many cases the open source movement simply feeds off of those open source projects that have "tightened their legs" around their source to gain more support contracts. The only open source project that I think is really worth screwing around with that I'm excited about is Vyatta.
Oh and Ubuntu is a Windows killer... we're what, 3 years into that argument? It does surf the net and check e-mail really well so obviously it blows Windows out of the water.
In general you have obviously been around for a while, even longer than me I'd imagine, but that experience hasn't yielded you any real insight into the tech market that I've found valuable. On occasion you bring a different viewpoint to the table that may be interesting, but after years and years of being proven wrong most are easily swept aside by me and used only for humor's sake.
Oh and as far as psychically married to Microsoft. I have 3 operating systems running at my fingertips in my office. Though currently my ubuntu install is dead from the latest update (it never came back from the reboot). My OSX box is simply to figure out the maze of bs involved in it's networking which I will admit Black Tabby (or w/e the version I have) seems to finally work reliably. I use what works after applying logic to the money I spend to be more productive. MS Office's costs are well worth my increased productivity. Any programmer not using Visual Studio needs to have their head examined. And Windows? I've done absolutely nothing to maintenance my Vista machine in the past couple years except reboot occasionally for user input required updates. So the $400 I've spent on that retail copy has more than been worth it.
Carry on :)
|
#16 By
15406 (216.191.227.68)
at
11/12/2009 8:43:29 AM
|
#15: my favorite lately was your description of depreciation as compound interest
Is that what that was? Silly me. I thought it was a case of someone trying to show that something is cheap because it's only pennies per day per unit, but failing to factor in the large scale of how many units cost pennies per day. Whatever.
Having a logical debate with you is a waste of time.
If your main argument is that MS is a wonderful company and should be allowed to do whatever it wishes, then you would be correct. If your main argument is that the ends always justify the means, even when the ends aren't in your best interest, then you would be correct. If you have one single point of view and refuse to acknowledge any facts that might challenge that view, then you would be correct.
Anybody who disagrees with you is an MS Fanboy. Personal Choice is irrelevant because people are stupid. All companies exist and thrive only by screwing their customers. Standards bodies will save the world from proprietary monsters. Linux is a step away from owning the desktop market (just one more Year). Nothing Microsoft produces is secure.
That's a big ole heap of strawmen there, champ. I don't believe or argue any of what you wrote. Were you deliberately trying to misrepresent what I say, or do you just not pay attention?
Standards will save us all even though my grandpa could push out a new HTML standard faster than the W3C.
So? Are you in some big hurry? The important part of a standard is the consensus supporting it, not the haste in which it was made. It's always faster to have a dictator decide something rather than a committee, but you might not like the results of the dictator's decision.
Oh and Ubuntu is a Windows killer... we're what, 3 years into that argument? It does surf the net and check e-mail really well so obviously it blows Windows out of the water.
No, Ubuntu is not a Windows killer, but it is a viable alternative to Windows for a great many people. Nothing more, nothing less.
On occasion you bring a different viewpoint to the table that may be interesting, but after years and years of being proven wrong most are easily swept aside by me and used only for humor's sake.
I don't think I remember being proven wrong for years & years. When I'm here, I'm either a) pointing out MS's latest evil deed, or, b) sparring with Mr. "Microsoft is perfect in every way" Ketchum about his latest fawning post of MS's wonderfulness. I have been wrong on occasion, but unlike the majority of those I regularly spar with here, I can admit when I'm wrong without resorting to games.
I have 3 operating systems running at my fingertips in my office.
Uh-huh. Surely you're not one of those guys that gushes over Windows, but pretends to also run various other OSes so that his opinion has more weight when he claims that Windows is best at everything?
|
|
|
|
|