#2 - "Advantages - its free!"
Hardly... the VAST majority of the cost associated with software isn't the initial purchase price, it's the total cost of ownership. I've never seen any independant studies that showed that OSS results in a lower TCO than closed source.
"Advantages - Full understanding of all APIs"
Ok, I'll give you that. One might gather a deeper understanding of the software, that's true. But that's really becoming less of an issue with software platforms like Java, COM, and .NET. These platforms expose their interface information via the use of meta data, and don't need to rely entirely on good documentation. (Although that sure as hell helps.)
"As for the revealing of Intellectual Property issue, it depends on the particular open source project."
True, but I was talking about my company producing OSS instead of keeping it closed. I would lose all my intellectual property in that scenario, and without the benefits of some kind of sense of security, I see no reason to do so, and many reasons not to.
In addition, a huge amount of the OSS out there is licensed under the GPL, which would require that I open up MY projects if I use any the code. Again, IP goes out the window.
"At any rate, there are still tremendous advantages to a commercially supported OSs and applications like Windows. Its simply an issue of which advantages you require"
Agreed, but I would suggest that OSS has no advantages now that the security myth has (perhaps) been dismissed.
|