|
|
User Controls
|
New User
|
Login
|
Edit/View My Profile
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac
|
Articles
|
Forums
|
Links
|
News
|
News Search
|
Reviews
|
|
|
|
News Centers
|
Windows/Microsoft
|
DVD
|
ActiveHardware
|
Xbox
|
MaINTosh
|
News Search
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats
|
The Lobby
|
Special Events Room
|
Developer's Lounge
|
XBox Chat
|
|
|
|
FAQ's
|
Windows 98/98 SE
|
Windows 2000
|
Windows Me
|
Windows "Whistler" XP
|
Windows CE
|
Internet Explorer 6
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
Xbox
|
DirectX
|
DVD's
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips
|
Registry Tips
|
Windows 95/98
|
Windows 2000
|
Internet Explorer 4
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
Windows NT Tips
|
Program Tips
|
Easter Eggs
|
Hardware
|
DVD
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews
|
Applications
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002
|
|
Hardware
|
Intel Personal Audio Player
3000
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse
Explorer
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info
|
About This Site
|
Affiliates
|
ANet Forums
|
Contact Us
|
Default Home Page
|
Link To Us
|
Links
|
Member Pages
|
Site Search
|
Awards
|
|
|
|
Credits
©1997/2004, Active Network. All
Rights Reserved.
Layout & Design by
Designer Dream. Content
written by the Active Network team. Please click
here for full terms of
use and restrictions or read our
Privacy Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time:
15:38 EST/20:38 GMT | News Source:
CNET |
Posted By: Alex Harris |
Apple Computer is expanding its retail store strategy as it considers new ways to draw Windows users to the Mac, according to sources close to the company's plans. The Cupertino, Calif.-based company is considering a number of in-store demonstrations to attract potential PC users, the sources said. One strategy under consideration would involve bringing Windows PCs into the stores, where customers could presumably be shown the advantages of Macs.
If the proposal is adopted, PCs from one or more manufacturers would be compared with Macs, the sources said. Apple also plans to run Connectix VirtualPC--emulation software for running Windows on Macs--on store demo units. This too would be part of the "conversion" strategy, showing potential PC customers that they could continue using current Windows software on their new Macs.
"There's this pervading perception of the Mac as being this alien, niche product," said Technology Business Research analyst Tim Deal. "If you can actually show PC users it's not as alien, not as different as they might think it is--something the Apple stores already are good at doing--certainly it's going to increase sales."
|
|
#1 By
135 (208.50.201.48)
at
6/9/2002 7:36:05 PM
|
Apple has pretty much relegated themselves to two markets... The Education market, and the Boutique computing market.
Small niches where interesting looking computers play very well.
And if you want to do some real work, they include a Windows emulator.
|
#2 By
135 (209.180.28.6)
at
6/10/2002 10:24:42 AM
|
BMW makes the best cars in the world! Lexus is just over priced, overhyped Japanese crap.
|
#3 By
2960 (156.80.64.164)
at
6/10/2002 10:45:30 AM
|
#1,
I totally agree that, in most cases, price is a problem. But performance isn't as much of a problem as it would seem. Problem? Yes, but not as bad as some make it out to be.
There are also area's where pricing isn't that bad, either. Take the maxed-out, high-end PowerBook G4, for example. If you compare it feature-for-feature, it can be a better value than the high-end Laptops from IBM and other manufacturers.
The LCD iMac/SuperDrive model, at $1899, isn't a terrible buy either when compared to a PC equipped comparatively using QUALITY components, and not the cheapest thing found on Pricewatch.
Finally, what really matters is how the whole package "works", and this has always been an Apple strong point.
IU
|
#4 By
2960 (156.80.64.164)
at
6/10/2002 10:55:05 AM
|
#7,
The difference is, most people who argue about cars at least partially know what they are talking about. Too many people dis Apple without having a clue of what they stand for, how the products work, etc...
The Mac and the PC both have their strengths. I own 4 PC's (two servers, an Athlon 1800+ Desktop, and an IBM ThinkPad Laptop). All were built by me, except for the Laptop.
I also own an LCD iMac G4.
This weekend I was working on a project that was mostly compiled on the PC. However, for the graphical elements used in the project, those were created on the iMac in Canvas 8 and transferred to the PC project over the Network.
All of my DVD burning is done on the iMac.
All of my Gaming is done on the PC.
My finances are done on the PC.
I use the web with both.
General apps are done on both. Everything is cross-platform in this regard, and I keep My Documents on the Server, where it is reachable by both machines.
Most of the arguments in here are based on Religeon or bragging (with a few cases of pure idiocy tossed in), and very little has to do with reality, because in reality both platforms are important and have their place.
TL
|
#5 By
20 (24.243.51.87)
at
6/10/2002 11:51:38 AM
|
TechLarry: Well, the simple fact is, anything you can do on the Mac you can do on the PC faster and cheaper.
Therefore, it begs the question, why use a Mac?
Sure, there are socio-political reasons, but it's for those very reasons that Mac users get flamed. It's the same thing for people who eat granola or organic food. They say they eat healthier when, in fact, organic food is just a marketing term and it's grown the same way as regular food.
If there was a compelling technical reason to use the Mac, there wouldn't be such a flame war.
|
#6 By
20 (24.243.51.87)
at
6/10/2002 2:05:37 PM
|
#14: Their personal perferences are irrelevant. I'm talking about performance and application compatibility.
PCs are faster than Macs. Period. No debate. This is well established.
For every piece of software on the Macs, there is the same or equivalent (or better!) piece of software on the PC.
Anything beyond that is a matter of personal preference for socio-political reasons. An objective person who was interested in getting the best bang for their buck and the best system to do what they had to accomplish would choose a PC. There's no other logical conclusion.
|
#7 By
2960 (156.80.64.164)
at
6/10/2002 4:09:57 PM
|
#12,
Why do some people use a Mac?
Because they CHOOSE to. Mac's are out-numbered 4-1 in my house, yet I still prefer to use the Mac for certain projects.
You tossed out the words "Cheaper" and "Faster". You avoided the words "Easier" or "More Enjoyable".
They _do_ apply.
I personally don't care what platform someone uses. Hey, it's all about using what you are comfortable with. That's why I use the Mac for the things I listed, and why I use the PC's and Servers for the things I listed.
This much I can guarantee you. If Mac's didn't exist, living with PC's would absolutely, totally SUCK and wouldn't be nearly as advanced as they are now.
A person shouldn't be made to feel 'tainted' because they prefer a Mac, or prefer a Mac for certain tasks.
And a person shouldn't be 'tainted' because they prefer a PC, either.
TL
|
#8 By
2459 (66.25.124.8)
at
6/10/2002 4:52:09 PM
|
I think you're wrong about PCs sucking had the Mac not been around. There are a lot of technical advancements that have occured in PC OSes that still have not made it to the Mac platform. Apple is just now getting down things like virtual/protected memory, true multitasking, and 3D video acceleration.
|
#9 By
135 (208.50.201.48)
at
6/10/2002 5:32:54 PM
|
Damn, nobody wants to argue about BMW and Lexus. :(
As usual the Mac zealots give way too much credit to Apple. What I always find interesting is how they fail to recognize what came before. Namely the Amiga and Atari ST which introduced Multimedia to video and music artists respectively, long before the Mac or PC.
|
#10 By
135 (209.180.28.6)
at
6/10/2002 11:40:17 PM
|
I used to be a Lexus zealot, and then one day I went out and bought a BMW. That was it for me, no more overhyped japanese crap!
:-)
Seriously, I used to be the same way with the Amiga. Bill Gates was the devil, Microsoft sucked. My computer wasn't popular because of Microsoft's manipulation, blah blah blah. It took me a long time to get over that attitude, but it's sort of like being an ex-smoker... now the zealotry just really makes me sick.
|
#11 By
4209 (163.192.21.3)
at
6/11/2002 9:01:05 AM
|
BMW is an overpriced Car as well, that costs more money to fix than any other car once there warranty is over. Then again so is Land Rover, Porsche, Audi, and Mercedes. It all depends on what you want to drive and how you want to look in it. It is a prestige thing.
There SodaBlue you happy now??? LOL. Anyway, same goes for the PC/Mac debate. You just have more choices in the car business.
This post was edited by mctwin2kman on Tuesday, June 11, 2002 at 09:02.
|
|
|
|
|