| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Chrome 10 vs. Internet Explorer 9 Reconsidered | |
|
||
| Time: 13:00 EST/18:00 GMT | News Source: ZDNet | Posted By: Robert Stein | ||
|
When I recently took a look at the brand new Chrome 10 Web browser, the results for the latest release candidate of Internet Explorer (IE) 9 puzzled me because they were so bad. Some of my readers were more than puzzled. Some were outraged and accused me of deliberating trying to set up IE to fail. Please. I call them like I see them and, in my tests, the IE 9 RC was just dreadfully slow compared to the others. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 313 Last | Next |
The time now is
11:46:59 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 228224 (24.200.59.136) at 3/11/2011 3:13:12 PM |
|
Unsure why people even bother using a RC in any comparison. it is not final. they haven't removed all the kinks in it.
Would you want to ben in a new jet that is a "Release Candidate"? :-) I looked at a beta in a VM that I was trashing anyways. saw it wasn't complete. Sill I poked around. And then I trashed the VM. Haven't looked at IE9 beta or RC since. |
| #2 By 16797 (193.200.150.152) at 3/11/2011 3:24:39 PM |
|
#1 Actually, repeated test showed that IE9 RC (32-bit) is faster than Chrome 10 on Sunspider test.
Originally, he used x64 (much slower, since it doesn't have optimized JS enginge). |
| #3 By 143 (216.205.223.146) at 3/11/2011 6:19:38 PM |
|
Chrome 11 Dev is surprisingly quick and stable with its new JS engine. This post was edited by donpacman on Friday, March 11, 2011 at 22:06. |
| #4 By 540802 (58.22.65.213) at 6/22/2011 6:57:49 AM |
|
http://www.myghdlove.com/ ghd straighteners cheap http://www.myghdlove.com/ cheap ghd http://www.myghdlove.com/ ghd hair straighteners http://www.myghdlove.com/ cheap ghd |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 313 Last | Next |
The time now is
11:46:59 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
