| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Exchange 2010 RTM! | |
|
||
| Time: 14:47 EST/19:47 GMT | News Source: TechNet Edge | Posted By: Andre Da Costa | ||
|
The big news today is that Exchange 2010 is now code complete. The senior leadership team has signed off on the final code, and it has been sent to early adopters for a final look before its public release. This Release To Manufacturing (RTM) milestone means we are well on our way to general availability and launch at TechEd Europe in November. For those of you attending TechEd in Berlin this year, be sure to visit the Exchange booth and tell them what you think of the product. I caught some of you on video with Crystal Flores at TechEd US earlier this year…Crystal will be looking for more of you in Berlin in a few weeks. If you can’t join in person, tune in via the Web (www.thenewefficiency.com) to be part of the launch. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 150 Last | Next |
The time now is
2:04:18 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 89249 (64.207.240.90) at 10/9/2009 12:36:20 PM |
| Launch Party imo. |
| #2 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 10/9/2009 1:33:38 PM |
| Hopefully it will be easier to install without the need for a PhD in Advanced Exchangology. |
| #3 By 23603 (66.131.70.155) at 10/9/2009 2:19:41 PM |
|
@latch
You never installed Exchange 2007 right? Seriously, Exchange 2007 is the most ridiculous software to install. Sure they are some configuring challenges...like any software. I am actually looking forward..especially the new I/O feature...man Exchange without a SAN.....now that is pretty sweet. This post was edited by EQ23 on Friday, October 09, 2009 at 14:21. |
| #4 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 10/9/2009 2:26:24 PM |
| #3: I wasn't the guy trying to install it, but I heard about the problems we had. Even Ketchum admitted once that it was a hassle to set up. If he's admitting it, it must be bad. |
| #5 By 89249 (64.207.240.90) at 10/9/2009 3:50:09 PM |
| I heard horror stories about going to 2007. So I'm still on 2003. However, 2010 is supposed to be amazing so I'm thrilled. |
| #6 By 8556 (173.27.242.53) at 10/9/2009 8:18:30 PM |
| #5: I thought 2003 was a pain in the ass! 2007 was worse? |
| #7 By 23275 (75.146.73.217) at 10/9/2009 8:47:01 PM |
|
E2K7 pre-SP1 was a real challenge and we're Exchange hosts and know that product well enough to have enabled Internet RPC over TCP using forced encryption over TCP/IP through ISA 2000 - back in 2000 and to have deployed RPC over HTTPS in Aug 2003 - a year before it was made stupid proof - AND... well enough then and now to have an Exchange answer properly for ALLL hosted domains under ActiveSync, which requires several hacks.
E2K7 was, while not a nightmare, extreme in the context of time and resources. We tested and devised both the referral method, and UCC and use UCC and recommend it to support the publishing of each domain one supports. We still take things a step further and provide entirely unique silo(ed) experiences for customers - entirely unique presence that not even MS offers in their hosted product - this add a great deal of added effort and steps for each user added to any "one" domain. While I'd do it again, I caution that we have a very deep understanding of how to set up and run Microsoft servers, including Exchange. I wrote candidly about our experiences with it here, and provided some good means for others to test their connections - http://blog.libertech.net/blogs/lketchum/archive/2007/07/06/hidden-exchange-2007-outook-2007-connection-tests-and-monitoring.aspx pre-SP1 the most of teh process was in commandlets and there was no installer -heck, there was not much of a management interface and it still does not integrate with E2K3's snap ins. Exchange 2010 is essentially, 2007 brought forward to make it 'easy' which is fine, but like it was for us after all we'd accomplished with 2K and 2K3, we felt a little cheated that others can now do so easily what we had to know so well. That knowledge took each of us a long time to gain. One last thing, we intentionally maintained a mixed environment so we could help other companies migrate, or add 2007. We are among the few that customize OWA and by the by... each time there is a rollup to apply, MS blows it away, so we have a small program we created to add our customizations back. Oh,.. and autodiscover and autoanswer, autoconfiguration are really great, but for a bit the OAB answer file stinks up the place when a remote OL Client is shut down. It takes a few sync cycles for it to provide a full CY of the GAL... I could go on and on with more... sorry. |
| #8 By 23603 (66.131.70.155) at 10/10/2009 9:24:27 AM |
|
@iketchum
"enabled Internet RPC over TCP using forced encryption over TCP/IP through ISA 2000" you are mad?? :-) I guess, you guys have upgrade to ISA 2006 SP1 by now ? :-) Of course, like ANY PRODUCT, if you don't use it has the standard and best practice, you will run into issues. I have done maybe over 100 Exchange 2003/2007 deployment (small-medium size company) and did not run into major issues. Sure I had to call MS Support some few times...but It was not a big deal. Overall, Exchange is by far the best messaging product out there... This post was edited by EQ23 on Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 09:26. |
| #9 By 23275 (24.239.223.126) at 10/10/2009 11:15:26 AM |
|
#8, Oh yeah, but I wanted to point out that we were enabling what "Outlook Anywhere" provides now, long before most had even thought of it by leveraging FEoTCP. We use 06 now as one of our FW's but also appliances - none of which are as good as ISA 2004/2006 in any context
(I am partisan here and really like ISA - it's been my favorite server off and on since it shipped). Are you using UCC or referral method on your deployments? We like DigitCert for UCC certs |
| #10 By 23603 (66.131.70.155) at 10/10/2009 11:40:11 AM |
|
#9
Yep, Digicert for UCC are the way to go... Stay away from Verisign for UCC deployments. |
| #11 By 247254 (213.181.104.7) at 10/31/2009 6:06:10 PM |
| Did anyone try the UCC cert from Candagainternet.com? |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 150 Last | Next |
The time now is
2:04:18 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
