| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Snow Leopard less secure than Windows, says hacker | |
|
||
| Time: 09:32 EST/14:32 GMT | News Source: TechWorld | Posted By: Andre Da Costa | ||
|
Snow Leopard lacks security features that are built in to Windows XP, Windows Vista and Windows 7, a noted Mac researcher has said. Dubbed ASLR, for address space layout randomisation, the technology randomly assigns data to memory to make it tougher for attackers to determine the location of critical operating system functions, and thus make it harder for them to craft reliable exploits. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 224 Last | Next |
The time now is
12:42:35 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 2960 (72.196.201.130) at 9/16/2009 9:39:51 AM |
|
Yet the net effect is I haven't seen an infected Mac in 8 years, yet I get 4-6 dozen Virus/Spyware tickets a month for PC's.
I don't know what the truth is, but I sure know what the reality is. This post was edited by TechLarry on Wednesday, September 16, 2009 at 09:42. |
| #2 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 9/16/2009 11:26:42 AM |
|
The CTO of Symantec uses a MacBook. Just sayin'.
|
| #3 By 241160 (65.90.202.10) at 9/16/2009 11:34:50 AM |
|
#1: Maybe if you spent as much time securing our network and configuring our user's access as you do on this site, our company would not be going belly-up.
#2: Sounds like it's more of a toy. If it were really a viable option, the CTO would make it a corporate standard. Just sayin'. |
| #4 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 9/16/2009 3:55:12 PM |
| #3: Great analysis considering you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Just sayin'. |
| #5 By 7754 (206.169.247.2) at 9/16/2009 6:28:36 PM |
| Higher security =/= fewer exploits. The problem is people saying things like "inherently more secure," "better security," "doesn't have security problems," etc. when those things are NOT true. You can say "it's less secure, but hackers generally ignore it," but you cannot say "it's more secure." |
| #6 By 241160 (71.58.225.185) at 9/16/2009 7:43:19 PM |
|
#4: "Trollope politely explained that he'd chosen a Mac because he prefers the platform's "ease of use" and "elegance". "
So his choice had nothing to do with security. Case closed! |
| #7 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 9/17/2009 8:07:07 AM |
|
#5: The Mac is safer but less secure.
#6: You claimed it was a toy and how he should have mandated Mac use company-wide. I called BS. None of that had anything to do with Mac security. |
| #8 By 2960 (72.196.201.130) at 9/17/2009 8:24:16 AM |
|
#3,
Latch (and we know it's you - nice try LOL)... You assume all of us have control over what gets implemented. Many of us don't, and simply have to live with and within what IS implemented by others. It ain't my call. |
| #9 By 37 (192.251.125.85) at 9/17/2009 9:08:41 AM |
| How is the Mac less secure? Because somebody said it was? |
| #10 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 9/17/2009 11:41:09 AM |
|
#8: Not me. I don't play the pseudonym game.
#9: The number & severity of its holes, the time between patches, and the ease with which seasoned crackers can exploit it as compared to Windows or Linux. |
| #11 By 7754 (206.169.247.2) at 9/17/2009 3:03:33 PM |
| #7,10--wow... I'm agreeing with Latch. :P I often think of it as the difference between riding a bike down Main Street vs. driving a tank in Iraq... the tank is obviously much better at resisting attacks, but you'd likely be safer on the bike. You can still get hurt on either, of course. |
| #12 By 28801 (65.90.202.10) at 9/18/2009 12:18:44 PM |
|
#11: Analogies suck like a vacuum.
That's why I never use them... |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 224 Last | Next |
The time now is
12:42:35 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
