|
|
User Controls
|
New User
|
Login
|
Edit/View My Profile
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac
|
Articles
|
Forums
|
Links
|
News
|
News Search
|
Reviews
|
|
|
|
News Centers
|
Windows/Microsoft
|
DVD
|
ActiveHardware
|
Xbox
|
MaINTosh
|
News Search
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats
|
The Lobby
|
Special Events Room
|
Developer's Lounge
|
XBox Chat
|
|
|
|
FAQ's
|
Windows 98/98 SE
|
Windows 2000
|
Windows Me
|
Windows "Whistler" XP
|
Windows CE
|
Internet Explorer 6
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
Xbox
|
DirectX
|
DVD's
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips
|
Registry Tips
|
Windows 95/98
|
Windows 2000
|
Internet Explorer 4
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
Windows NT Tips
|
Program Tips
|
Easter Eggs
|
Hardware
|
DVD
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews
|
Applications
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002
|
|
Hardware
|
Intel Personal Audio Player
3000
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse
Explorer
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info
|
About This Site
|
Affiliates
|
ANet Forums
|
Contact Us
|
Default Home Page
|
Link To Us
|
Links
|
Member Pages
|
Site Search
|
Awards
|
|
|
|
Credits
©1997/2004, Active Network. All
Rights Reserved.
Layout & Design by
Designer Dream. Content
written by the Active Network team. Please click
here for full terms of
use and restrictions or read our
Privacy Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
#1 By
8556 (74.84.87.66)
at
12/4/2008 10:40:03 AM
|
Define "insecure program". With the release of Jave 6 update 11, is Java 6 update 10 now "insecure"?
|
#2 By
92283 (70.67.2.125)
at
12/4/2008 12:04:20 PM
|
#1 Of course it is. Thats the definition.
|
#3 By
7754 (206.169.247.2)
at
12/4/2008 12:49:37 PM
|
Um... aren't all programs "insecure"? They all have vulnerabilities waiting to be found, right?
("insecure"--sounds like they have an inferiority complex or something....)
|
#4 By
15406 (216.191.227.68)
at
12/4/2008 1:21:53 PM
|
Well, come on, guys. Doesn't every version of Windows come with Internet Explorer?...
|
#5 By
82766 (211.26.160.18)
at
12/4/2008 8:10:50 PM
|
and doesn't every one install Adobe Reader, Java VM, RealPlayer, iTunes, Safari, Firefox, etc...
ALL of these programs have known and published security holes... unless they're fixed. And then we wait for other security holes to be found.
|
#7 By
143 (96.28.66.94)
at
12/5/2008 4:27:35 AM
|
The most insecure part of a PC is the user.
|
#8 By
143 (96.28.66.94)
at
12/5/2008 4:27:45 AM
|
*This site still gives me errors when posting*
This post was edited by donpacman on Friday, December 05, 2008 at 04:31.
|
#9 By
15406 (216.191.227.68)
at
12/5/2008 12:29:26 PM
|
#6: Good God, man! You've caught the parkkker misdirection flu!
|
#10 By
28801 (65.90.202.10)
at
12/5/2008 12:46:44 PM
|
Yeah, I can see how providing a link to a current article with direct relevancy to this thread's topic could be construed as misdirection.
|
#11 By
28801 (65.90.202.10)
at
12/5/2008 12:53:07 PM
|
still rolling eyes...
|
#12 By
15406 (216.191.227.68)
at
12/5/2008 2:16:56 PM
|
#10: I thought you were doing it to counter my hilarious yet topical mention of IE. I'm just so used to seeing parkkker do it.
|
#13 By
9589 (68.17.52.2)
at
12/5/2008 3:36:16 PM
|
Secunia is just trolling for customers. They have a web scan, personal scan, and network scan version of their NSI scanning software. The latter is at cost; the others are free. The information on them is here: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/ .
|
#14 By
23275 (71.91.9.16)
at
12/6/2008 10:14:13 AM
|
Welcome to today, Latch - the old, tired and now irrelevant "IE is not secure" line immediatly dates, and casts anyone using it.
By a very wide margin (let us debate it any time you wish) the most secure online experience is found on Windows Vista x64 running IE 7 in its default protected mode.
I've shared the path many times - the components in the armor belt are well documented.
MS moved forward; it advanced and it leads all others in balancing security with a great user experience - on and off-line.
It's worth the time to discuss it.
|
|
|
|
|