| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Microsoft: It’s time to consummate the marriage with Citrix already | |
|
||
| Time: 00:11 EST/05:11 GMT | News Source: ZDNet | Posted By: Kenneth van Surksum | ||
|
The relationship between Microsoft and Citrix is much like that of a man who has been serially dating the same woman for 15 years, but never seems to be able to consummate the deal. He’s afraid of commitment, or perhaps like that old expression goes, why would he buy the cow when he can have the milk for free? | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 316 Last | Next |
The time now is
6:23:46 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 9/15/2008 1:18:06 PM |
|
A lot of companies that partner with Microsoft tend to get "consummated", whether they want to or not.
|
| #2 By 92283 (142.32.208.234) at 9/15/2008 1:39:48 PM |
| Name 10 that didn't want to. |
| #3 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 9/15/2008 2:01:52 PM |
| #2: Burst, Sendo, STAC Electronics, Spyglass, IBM, and that's after about 10 seconds of thinking. I could easily find more, but it's a waste of time, isn't it? If I come up with 10 companies that got screwed by MS, would you then publicly admit that I'm right and you're wrong? No? I didn't think so. |
| #4 By 28801 (65.90.202.10) at 9/15/2008 2:26:52 PM |
| Just curious - How exactly did IBM get screwed by Microsoft? |
| #5 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 9/15/2008 2:28:27 PM |
|
#4: Look up OS/2.
|
| #6 By 28801 (65.90.202.10) at 9/15/2008 2:41:35 PM |
| So MS made a business decision to concentrate more on Windows than OS2. Big Deal. And it looks like it was the right decision. |
| #7 By 45754 (83.87.126.155) at 9/15/2008 3:14:28 PM |
|
Brian Madden also has an opinion about the rumors of MS buying Citrix:
Read here: http://www.brianmadden.com/blog/BrianMadden/Why-Douglas-Brown-and-John-C-Dvorak-are-100-wrong-about-Microsoft-buying-Citrix |
| #8 By 92283 (142.32.208.234) at 9/15/2008 3:21:26 PM |
|
Spyglass - Microsoft licensed the technology
Sendo screwed up by dumping Microsoft as a partner. "But the demise of Sendo is not so much due to Redmond skulduggery, as the sheer difficulty of being a small player in a high-volume market like mobile phones, particularly if you're based in high-cost Britain. Sendo's strategy of pursuing both ends of the market without the research budgets or the economies of scale of a major player made the odds against success even worse." http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/09/28/how_britain_lost_sendo/ STAC "a California jury ruled the infringement by Microsoft was not willful, but awarded Stac $120 million in compensatory damages, coming to about $5.50 per copy of MS-DOS 6.0 that had been sold. The jury also agreed with a Microsoft counterclaim that Stac had misappropriated the Microsoft trade secret of a pre-loading feature that was included in Stacker 3.1, and simultaneously awarded Microsoft $13.6 million on the counterclaim." etc etc |
| #9 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 9/15/2008 3:41:10 PM |
|
#6: The mafia whacking a guy could also be described as a "business decision". Most companies don't partner with someone and then develop a competing product in secret.
#8: You should have been a defense attorney: "My client didn't kill 20 people. He, uh, lowered the resource drain on the Earth! Yeah. That's the ticket!" And you're quoting from the Register again. You know, that rag that isn't fit to wrap fish in according to you? But only when they're coming down on MS, I assume, right? Of course, I knew when I started to list the companies screwed by MS you would spin everything out of the Universe. You're so predictable. |
| #10 By 28801 (65.90.202.10) at 9/16/2008 6:55:14 AM |
|
"Most companies don't partner with someone and then develop a competing product in secret."
What? From Wikipedia, which you so often use as a source: "IBM grew concerned about the delays in development of OS/2 2.0 and the diversion of IBM funds earmarked for OS/2 development towards Windows" There was no secret! |
| #11 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 9/16/2008 11:59:57 AM |
| #10: They committed to IBM and then pulled the rug out from under them when they shifted priority from OS/2 to Windows. |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 316 Last | Next |
The time now is
6:23:46 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
