#5, You see in your statement the real problem... the issues, opportunity and frankly, the responsibility, are not limited to 'interoperability'
all of the above are much more about the integration of a system of systems - which MS should not be compelled to forfeit. Often, court actions attempt to do exactly that.
It is very hard to explain to people who have not evolved that kind of service - where managing not just a bunch of server types is where the value is, but in the platform and its architecture. It takes a very long time to build that and bake in the required skill and understanding from that larger perspective.
So when we say things like 'interoperability' casually, we're not helping anyone - especially not enterprises where their entire world centers on building and sustaining what I am talking about. I think where you get confused is that when MS speaks to 'interoperability' they are truthfully offering just that - what they are not willing to do, nor should they be made to do, is all the other very hard work - costly work, that makes all of it work as one well integrated solution that can scale in, up, down and out. That's where organizations serving the EU seem so ridiculous to so many of us. (as an example)
|