| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Windows Server 2008 Release Candidate 0 (RC0) Screenshot Gallery | |
|
||
| Time: 14:06 EST/19:06 GMT | News Source: SuperSite for Windows | Posted By: Michael Dragone | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 290 Last | Next |
The time now is
2:42:29 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 32313 (208.131.186.18) at 9/28/2007 5:17:06 PM |
| I find it strange they still have not updated the branding. Its still labeled as Windows "Codenamed" Longhorn. Maybe its just Thurrott rehashing old build screenshots, because I saw a leaked copy of Server 2008 Enterprise RC0 with the updated branding. So, something is not right at all. |
| #2 By 17996 (66.235.42.86) at 9/28/2007 11:37:58 PM |
|
Paul's screenshots are definitely not right. They appear to be of Beta 3. (Beta 3's about box said "Service Pack 1, v.126" and so does Paul's.)
A little tibdit about the build numbers... it appears that the service pack build number (126 in this case) is equal to the sub-build number (16510 in Beta 3's case) minus 16384. Actually, since 16384 is 0x4000 in hex, it is more likely the other way around... the sub build number equals the service pack number or'd with the flag 0x4000. Vista RTM'd with a sub-build number of 16386, which probably indicates that they did two additional builds after rounding the main build number to 6000. RC0 on the other hand (which is equal to Vista SP1) is build 6001.16659. Which would suggest that the service pack number should be v.275. Which is exactly what Vista SP1 shows (http://content.zdnet.com/2346-12554_22-166470-8.html). So Paul's shots are definitely bogus. |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 290 Last | Next |
The time now is
2:42:29 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
