|
|
User Controls
|
New User
|
Login
|
Edit/View My Profile
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac
|
Articles
|
Forums
|
Links
|
News
|
News Search
|
Reviews
|
|
|
|
News Centers
|
Windows/Microsoft
|
DVD
|
ActiveHardware
|
Xbox
|
MaINTosh
|
News Search
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats
|
The Lobby
|
Special Events Room
|
Developer's Lounge
|
XBox Chat
|
|
|
|
FAQ's
|
Windows 98/98 SE
|
Windows 2000
|
Windows Me
|
Windows "Whistler" XP
|
Windows CE
|
Internet Explorer 6
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
Xbox
|
DirectX
|
DVD's
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips
|
Registry Tips
|
Windows 95/98
|
Windows 2000
|
Internet Explorer 4
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
Windows NT Tips
|
Program Tips
|
Easter Eggs
|
Hardware
|
DVD
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews
|
Applications
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002
|
|
Hardware
|
Intel Personal Audio Player
3000
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse
Explorer
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info
|
About This Site
|
Affiliates
|
ANet Forums
|
Contact Us
|
Default Home Page
|
Link To Us
|
Links
|
Member Pages
|
Site Search
|
Awards
|
|
|
|
Credits
©1997/2004, Active Network. All
Rights Reserved.
Layout & Design by
Designer Dream. Content
written by the Active Network team. Please click
here for full terms of
use and restrictions or read our
Privacy Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time:
12:46 EST/17:46 GMT | News Source:
APC Mag |
Posted By: Andre Da Costa |
It's no secret that there's a leaked beta of Vista SP1 floating
around, but no-one yet has really taken the time to analyse it in
detail to find out what it really does. I made it my mission this
weekend to trawl through the registry and file changes in SP1 to find
out exactly what SP1 does.
First up, I can say that there is a very noticeable performance
increase. It is obvious that since Microsoft released Vista to
manufacturing, it has been optimising the code ever since. There’s
far less hard drive thrashing and in general the system seems much
smoother and more responsive.
|
|
#1 By
3653 (68.52.54.161)
at
8/12/2007 1:28:50 AM
|
hopefully, microsoft wont pull and apple and charge us $109 for this update.
;-)
|
#2 By
32313 (208.131.186.18)
at
8/12/2007 10:40:00 AM
|
Certainly not, its just a collection of hotfixes released since RTM and performance improvements, four of which were released just a few days ago. Of course, Vista RTM retail and OEM packages will be refreshed with Vista SP1 over time.
|
#3 By
2960 (24.254.95.224)
at
8/13/2007 10:18:10 AM
|
At least Apple's full OS releases are $109. Microsoft's are up to $400.
I never understood this argument :)
I'm not saying I disagree with it. I wish Apple DID have update pricing. But at least their full OS cost is no where near what Microsoft's is.
And don't forget the 5 user home pack for like $199, no activation nonsense, no WGA heartache's, etc...
TL
|
#4 By
23275 (24.179.4.158)
at
8/13/2007 10:42:01 AM
|
#3, such comparisons are unfortunate and they do invite further comparison... I mean, exactly what percentage of the world is pirating OS X and iLife/work? The companies face very different issues.
Also, arguments that "windows has been around and its monoploy... etc... are not valid" - Again, Apple has been around a very long time - as has OS X/Next and the *nix it is partly based upon... no one is flocking in droves to them now, and that is the same as it was before.
Finally, the last three [which is all of them] Macs I saw running were all booted into Windows Vista! Mac hardware, Microsoft software.
I think we have to look at the platforms for what they are and avoid the comparisons as we each have provided - they are only partly relevant in each of our cases, but their significance is reduced by both differences in the platforms and their similarities.
|
#5 By
7754 (206.169.247.2)
at
8/13/2007 11:04:08 AM
|
no activation nonsense, no WGA heartache's, etc...
And no hardware choice, no supplier choice, etc. :P
Not that I didn't wish Microsoft also had a home user pack--I think they should. But you have to consider at the same time that Apple is making money on the hardware for each of those users as well. Microsoft does not.
And... regarding the $400 quote, if we're comparing (ugh... here it comes) apples to Apples, we should be comparing at OEM and upgrade prices for Windows. If you're buying OS X (legally), you're either buying it with Apple hardware or for Apple hardware. Apple has no OS offering that correlates to full-retail Windows in that sense.
|
#6 By
2960 (24.254.95.224)
at
8/14/2007 7:41:50 AM
|
#5,
I'm FAR happier with the quality of Apple Hardware than I am the problems imposed by WGA, Activation, etc...
TL
|
#7 By
3746 (76.65.203.15)
at
8/14/2007 9:39:15 AM
|
Mac hardware never really did it for me. I wanted to get a mac to spend more time with OS X but paying more just to get the system in black (macbook) wasn't going to happen. Plus the specs are not that great compared to what is out there. Ended up with the new Dell XPS 1330 to replace my road machine. Vista is running great and no complaints. Never had a problem with WGA/Activation so I could care less.
This post was edited by kaikara on Tuesday, August 14, 2007 at 09:40.
|
#8 By
7754 (206.169.247.2)
at
8/14/2007 12:07:14 PM
|
#6--that makes a little bit of sense in the context, but it's still confusing--you're comparing hardware against software. I'm not really jazzed on the whole activation thing either, although I've never had a problem... other than installing the KMS for Vista (which was really, really easy), I've never really had to worry about it.
It's not like Apple doesn't have its own copy protection--they go with what is essentially the "dongle" route. The dongle is the Apple hardware.
|
#9 By
23275 (24.179.4.158)
at
8/14/2007 12:28:06 PM
|
#8, Good and valid point.
|
#10 By
2960 (24.254.95.224)
at
8/15/2007 1:36:06 PM
|
I'm talking overal ownership experience, which always seems to fall to the wayside when discussing the Mac vs. PC thing...
TL
|
|
|
|
|