This weekend Eric Lai of
Computerworld attempted to describe the possible relationship between
Vista's DRM and Microsoft's
licensing restrictions against virtualization. The view that Microsoft's
prohibition stems from fears that users will circumvent DRM isn't new, but the
article comes at an opportune time: Microsoft came
within an inch of reversing their position last week, but then backed off. The
time is ripe for more speculation as to just why Microsoft says "no"
to the virtualization of those two OSes, yet allows virtualization of other editions of Vista. I think Lai's
contribution to the discussion is interesting, but I'm not convinced that DRM
has much to do with the issue. In fact, I'm fairly certain there's a bigger
concern at Redmond, and it has nothing to do with DRM, and everything to do with the long-term fate of Windows.
|