Mooresa56, My absolute favorite of all time was a real one - losely translated from the Russian
[Circa 1973]: "In an international race, today, a Soviet driver completed the race in second place. The American driver finished second to last."
The paper, "Pravda" or the "Truth" failed to include the fact that there were only two cars in the race!
I have not seen or heard anything that one could consider journalism since William L. Shirer passed away many years ago. He was perhaps the most courageous journalists that ever lived - suffering great hardship at the hands of Ed Murrow, of all people. For years many fellow conservatives were highly critical of me for defending Mr. Shirer so fiercely - he was after all, Black-Listed as being pro "Red" - he wasn't by the way... he simply disagreed with the Truman Doctrine. [side note: you can't imagine how tough it is to sustain independent thought while serving a government - any government]. Shirer, in my opinion, the consumate journalist, wanted to examine not only our own motives, but those of the former Soviet Union's as well - seeking to understand them and perhaps prevent another terrible war. For this, he nearly starved until his most successful book, "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich" was published in 1960 [and printed nearly two dozen more times after]. His best work is, "20th Century Journey" We tend to give all credit to President Ronald Reagan for the end of the cold war. This is simply awful. Yes, he was very central to that, but he had the most supportive and important partner he could have, Mikhail Gorbachev - a man who deserves the majority of the credit for having the guts to ask one question: "What? What shall I do? Send in the tanks AGAIN?" He didn't of course, but he certainly could have. How different might our world now be if only "journalists" would have honored Gorbachev and Reagan equally. Understanding and a real personal friendship created that famous question - not any feat of political, or real arms. Journalists would have told this story, this way and today, Russia would be very close to us - we'd help them become wealthy recovering their oil and we'd have a source of fuel outside SW Asia and Venezuala. Instead, pundits told it one way and one way only.
For a very long time, journalism has been dead. Instead, reporting begins with a set of ideals and goals - most track with those of the publisher, or network and they hire people who agree with them. Long before a story is written, "The Story" is "decided" and the results tailored to suite the publisher. We see it, read it and hear it everyday and it is dreadful.
I doubt that anyone can even teach journalism well any longer. It is a science that will have to be rediscovered. That isn't new. Many sciences have been lost and found again many times in our brief history as a literate species. Part politics, part news as entertainment, it's all garbage and the more one is exposed to it, the more like a potted plant they become.
My advice - write - write constantly - about everything you think. Then read it - within it, one may discover a great deal about what does matter to them. With that understanding and against what one reads, or hears in the press, may be found the very obvious departures from journalism and shocking omissions of fact, or the misrepresentations of it. For myself it was pretty simple - I couldn't save the world, but I could save the really tiny piece I was standing on. [all career soldiers really do think that if they are good enough, then all people will be free and find peace - some don't want it].
Such nonsense will end when the majority of people figure out that it is better to do what is right rather than be right - or we're replaced by the next species to dominate this puny little island we call home.
#6, LOL - that was funny.
|