|
|
User Controls
|
New User
|
Login
|
Edit/View My Profile
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac
|
Articles
|
Forums
|
Links
|
News
|
News Search
|
Reviews
|
|
|
|
News Centers
|
Windows/Microsoft
|
DVD
|
ActiveHardware
|
Xbox
|
MaINTosh
|
News Search
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats
|
The Lobby
|
Special Events Room
|
Developer's Lounge
|
XBox Chat
|
|
|
|
FAQ's
|
Windows 98/98 SE
|
Windows 2000
|
Windows Me
|
Windows "Whistler" XP
|
Windows CE
|
Internet Explorer 6
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
Xbox
|
DirectX
|
DVD's
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips
|
Registry Tips
|
Windows 95/98
|
Windows 2000
|
Internet Explorer 4
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
Windows NT Tips
|
Program Tips
|
Easter Eggs
|
Hardware
|
DVD
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews
|
Applications
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002
|
|
Hardware
|
Intel Personal Audio Player
3000
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse
Explorer
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info
|
About This Site
|
Affiliates
|
ANet Forums
|
Contact Us
|
Default Home Page
|
Link To Us
|
Links
|
Member Pages
|
Site Search
|
Awards
|
|
|
|
Credits
©1997/2004, Active Network. All
Rights Reserved.
Layout & Design by
Designer Dream. Content
written by the Active Network team. Please click
here for full terms of
use and restrictions or read our
Privacy Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time:
14:21 EST/19:21 GMT | News Source:
Microsoft |
Posted By: Jonathan Tigner |
At 8 a.m. today the bell will ring to open one of the most advanced high schools ever conceived. The School of the Future is the result of a unique collaboration between the School District of Philadelphia, Microsoft Corp. and the community of West Philadelphia that will deliver a new approach to curriculum and school design and the infusion of technology into the daily lives of educators and learners. The school is a state-of-the-art working example of this public-private partnership, featuring a progressive and research-based curriculum, integrated technology, and environmentally advanced architecture. What’s more, the entire project was completed within the strict confines of a standard urban public-school budget.
“What we have proven through this project is that the ‘School of the Future’ is not too futuristic or out of reach,” said Paul Vallas, CEO of the School District of Philadelphia. “This is how schools of today can and should be designed and developed to adequately prepare students for life and work. I hope the school leaders who come and see what we’ve accomplished here in Philadelphia walk away saying, ‘We can do that, too, and we can start now.’”
|
|
#1 By
3653 (68.52.143.149)
at
9/7/2006 8:46:16 PM
|
these kids have a fighting chance at learning... now that the macs are gone
|
#2 By
52115 (66.181.69.250)
at
9/8/2006 8:17:33 AM
|
How long before the systems are hacked and then the school is going to wonder what mistake they made? I wonder if they'll still have MS techs coming out to resolve issues?
Not saying *nix would be any better; any system is vulnerable. If there's a will, there's a way.
|
#3 By
15406 (216.191.227.68)
at
9/8/2006 8:59:19 AM
|
#2: Not just hacked. How long before the systems are totally infested with viruses, malware and every other Windows nasty out there? Kids aren't notorious for safe computing practices.
|
#4 By
47914 (24.225.231.107)
at
9/8/2006 10:14:14 AM
|
Another Great idea, and I'm truly sincere. As a teacher of technology at the secondary level, I have first-hand experience in a primarily low income school, and the problem is definitely funding the facilities and equipment for new technology (computers) such as Philly is doing(or should I say Microsoft), but even more so in maintainence, and updating the software and equipment in subsequent years. In the school I was in, after one year with brand new equipment, so much of was broken down, that it was not available for most of the student population. This same district woefully underfunded the operating and maintence of this technology and equipment, and tax-payers consistently voted down school operating budgets, so the whole idea was doomed after one year. Now I'm in a more upper middle class district, but unfortunately it's the same story, the tax payers do NOT approve operating budgets and there's still not enough money to fund technology. It will be interesting to see how Philly, which I live near, deals with this funding issue, and who (taxpayers or Microsoft), pays to keep funding the budgets for this school in future years. My guess is , it will be Microsoft and not the taxpayers. But...we'll see.
This post was edited by mirt on Friday, September 08, 2006 at 11:23.
|
#5 By
32132 (142.32.208.233)
at
9/8/2006 11:15:48 AM
|
Our K12 district uses Deep Freeze http://www.faronics.com/index.asp (and they even have a Mac version) to lockdown schools PC's.
Microsoft offers the Shared Computer Toolkit for XP for free to do the same thing as Deep Freeze: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/sharedaccess/default.mspx
The sad thing is recently we had to buy 19" CRT's instead of LCD's because LCD's are too easy to steal. You knw, not many companies still make CRT's!
|
#6 By
47914 (24.225.231.107)
at
9/8/2006 11:33:53 AM
|
Yes, physically locking them down and locking out admin rights is one thing, but I speak of stolen mice, broken back panel connections, broken drive bays etc. I always felt I have relatively good classroom control and very few of these problems, but unfortunately, there are limited labs(and computers) and some teachers bring in their classes, proceed to grade papers or do lesson plans, and pay little attention to what the students are doing to the computers and equipment. It only takes several times of this happening 'til enough of the lab computers are "down", too long and not enough money to fix or replace the equipment, resulting in doubling and tripling of students per computer, then the students lose interest, and so on and so on....
|
#7 By
52115 (66.181.69.250)
at
9/8/2006 1:39:29 PM
|
Kinda off topic, but in #4 you mention that the taxpayers keeps voting down the operating budgets.. And I'm not slaming teachers, it's not their fault.. My Dad was a teacher for 36 years..
Well, as a home owner that has to pay taxes, of which 56% goes to the local school district (and we have the lowest taxes in the county), I get sick of seeing the "We need money, we need money" and you vote to pass it. It passes and what's the first thing they do, give all the administrators RAISES. Then another 2 years down the line, you hear, "We need money, we need money"..
Case in point, our district passed a levy a few years ago (4 to 5 years).. The first thing they do with it is build a new middle school (which wasn't needed since the old school had plenty of room for the kids).. In november, they're trying to pass another "operating" levy (3 years 9.97 mil).. It's been shot down 4 times already (once in March already) and of the four others this is the largest they're trying to pass yet..
Sorry.. Just had to let off some steam.. hahaha
|
#8 By
15406 (216.191.227.68)
at
9/8/2006 3:03:24 PM
|
At a cost of ~$370,000 per student, it's the school of the future so long as the education budget is 90 trillion dollars.
|
#9 By
32132 (142.32.208.233)
at
9/8/2006 4:28:58 PM
|
#8 Actually coffee girl, the budget is 1.5 billion for Philadelphia to construct 10 new high schools (among other things)
"The School of the Future is one of 10 new, public high schools that the District plans to build as part of its $1.5 billion Capital Plan. This school exemplifies the goals of the District's Secondary Education Movement: its sweeping education reform plan for the city's public high schools announced in February 2003. The plan calls for more choices in smaller high schools, academic support programs for struggling students and exemplary programs in every neighborhood secondary school."
The 63,000,000 for this school is a bit of a bargain.
To give morons like coffee girl an idea of how much it costs to build a "normal" school:
http://www.leesburg2day.com/current.cfm?catid=5&newsid=11603
"Again in January of 2004, a new high school at an undetermined location was projected to cost about $65 million. In the new CIP, the high school — now named a Dulles-area school — is projected to cost more than $97 million when it is funded in FY 2009."
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/education/2003135681_snohomishcosts19n.html
"Higher-than-expected construction costs for an elementary school planned to open in fall 2007 in the Snohomish district have driven up the project's price tag from $17 million to an estimated $23 million, said Karen Riddle, the district finance manager.
The projected cost of a new Snohomish-district high school has risen from $68 million to $76 million. The estimated cost of a major renovation to Snohomish High School has climbed from $64 million to $71 million."
This post was edited by NotParker on Friday, September 08, 2006 at 16:30.
|
#10 By
11888 (70.49.84.105)
at
9/8/2006 9:55:21 PM
|
NotParker why can't you make a point without being an insulting jerk? It's just sad to come by here. No wonder sites like Digg come along and crush the snot out of sites like this.
|
#11 By
32132 (64.180.219.241)
at
9/9/2006 10:41:52 AM
|
#10 I apologize. I know I should feel pity for people like coffee girl who only come to Windows sites to spew anti-Microsoft vitriol and I should treat them like I would any other mentally challenged visitor.
And then I remember coffee girl has a PIII-500 and gets the coffee for the people who do real work and I can't help myself and I have to call him a moron when he says moronic things.
|
#12 By
47914 (24.225.231.107)
at
9/11/2006 9:18:38 AM
|
#7, School taxes is one of the only taxes that taxpayers can vote DIRECTLY for or against in many states. I feel that most folks simply vote no because they're on fixed incomes (retired) or it is simply a chance for most to make a "statement" to say "NO" to taxes. Surely, we all feel overtaxed, but expenditures on prisoners are running in excess of $20,000 per prisoner and expenditures on students in my area is 6k to 10k. If you could EITHER vote for 100% health care benefits for convicted rapists or children of school age, which would you vote for? If you could provide state of the art exercise equipment for school age children or convicted criminals, which would you vote for? By and large our representatives are voting on our behalf in favor of criminals, and the taxpayers are by and large voting NO for our students. I am not suggesting to take the power of the vote away from taxpayers, but suggesting that we all KNOW what our representatives are voting to spend our tax dollars on. The biggest waste these days is NOT in the schools, but in what our governments: Feds, STate, and Locals are spending our tax money on, IMHO
|
|
|
|
|