Some valid points perhaps, but he forgets to consider one very important thing: opportunity cost. If Microsoft had never developed IE, they would not be in the place they are today, they wouldn't have the influence they have today, they wouldn't have learned the lessons they know today, etc. IE may be by far the biggest culprit for the security woes of Windows, but that was an error of implementation, not its mere existence.
His claim that Microsoft should drop IE altogether is a bit ridiculous, though. What other company would voluntarily remove a product from the market when it owns 80-90% of that market? Dvorak says stuff like this all the time, but I guess I can't really blame him. It can't be easy turning out article after article like this week after week, and the guy's gotta eat.
|