"Actually most of the responses that I read were mostly favorable. They thought it was good, but they had a couple of other provisions they'd like to see. I think if the DOJ revises this slightly it will be passed by the Judge."
Which comments have you been reading? I've read about 30 of the 47, and there's not too many of them that say this is good. And the ones that do defend the PFJ do nothing to rebut the flaws raised by others. They just say similarly retarded statements as the Competitive Impact Statement like "This will restore competition to the technology marketplace."
If you just read the first 2 (some private citizen/programmer and the Antitrust Assoc., you'll see that the PFJ is so flawed and so much of what MS wanted that I can't imagine the DOJ and MS will make enough revisions to get to the point where this is acceptable. No, I think people are going to start realizing that the DOJ gave MS everything they wanted because that's what the current administration represents.
But what the hell does Ashcroft say after defending this thing as pro-consumer, pro-competitive, and remedial to all of MS's illegal tactics, when K-K says, "no it's not, it's ridiculous, and you have a conviction, settlement is not granted, see you back in court when you have an actual remedy for this convicted monopoly."
|