| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Is Linux ready to challenge MS Vista? | |
|
||
| Time: 15:48 EST/20:48 GMT | News Source: Computer Weekly | Posted By: Chris Hedlund | ||
|
Another turbulent period of change is facing organisations over the next two years. Desktop roll-outs are one of the biggest and costliest headaches for any enterprise, and the prospect of another version of Windows is daunting. At the Brainshare Novell user conference in Salt Lake City last month the company flagged the summer launch of version 10 of its SuSE Linux Enterprise operating system for servers and desktops. The company is positioning its Linux offering as a less complex alternative to the Vista release of Windows. Jack Messman, chief executive and president of Novell, said, "Microsoft's Vista is going to require a big migration and more end-user training, and it makes sense that corporations will look at desktop Linux as an alternative now." | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 306 Last | Next |
The time now is
11:07:49 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 32132 (142.32.208.232) at 4/19/2006 4:02:53 PM |
| No. |
| #2 By 2459 (24.175.137.39) at 4/19/2006 4:06:02 PM |
|
"The company is positioning its Linux offering as a less complex alternative to the Vista release of Windows."
lol |
| #3 By 1401 (65.255.137.20) at 4/19/2006 4:29:07 PM |
|
Windows came from the desktop world and is moving into the server world. Linux (Unix) came from the server world and is moving into the desktop world. The way I see it, Windows has made much more progress moving into servers than Linux has made into desktops.
And in two weeks I will be in St Louis for week long Linux training... (Is that how long it takes to learn Linux? A week?) |
| #4 By 37 (24.183.100.179) at 4/19/2006 4:45:31 PM |
| Vista > Linux Distros |
| #5 By 7754 (216.160.8.41) at 4/19/2006 4:56:36 PM |
|
They better start doing some real work (darn it) on getting the Vista message out to the IT community and elsewhere. So far, everyone seems to think:
1) There isn't much new in Vista... eye-candy UI, who cares? 2) XP is already fine/good enough 3) If there is something new in Vista, Microsoft is back-porting it to XP anyways Yet there is so much more out there... in fact, way too much! In a way, Apple is smart by introducing just a few changes every year or so--it's much more easily digestible and easy to market (but on the other hand, they have a fanatical base that will buy a new version if there were only one new feature). Every time I go to Channel9 or the blogs or elsewhere, I'm finding out something significant and new in Vista. It's huge. Start spreading the freaking message, Microsoft. This is your game to lose. |
| #6 By 1401 (65.255.137.20) at 4/19/2006 7:09:04 PM |
| But the thing is #5 - there's really not that much to start spreading the message about. See the next news item on the main page... |
| #7 By 3653 (68.52.143.149) at 4/19/2006 8:40:23 PM |
|
msft doesnt need to market to a great deal of BUSINESS users. Search for "software assurance" for the reason why.
For consumers, there's going to be a ton of marketing around media center functionality, the new UI, and URGE. That threesome will tell a simple and compelling story to consumers. if only msft's "competitors" would make some progress... but they keep stumbling over their own feet. browser - did anyone notice new alarm bells going off on mozilla's security flaws? http://news.com.com/2100-1002_3-6062929.html?part=rss&tag=6062929&subj=news apple - market share continues to drop, as this tiny note in the last paragraph states... http://news.com.com/2100-1003_3-6062973.html?part=rss&tag=6062973&subj=news and they are plugging security holes on what feels like a daily basis lately... http://news.com.com/2100-1002_3-6062766.html?part=rss&tag=6062766&subj=news This post was edited by mooresa56 on Wednesday, April 19, 2006 at 20:48. |
| #8 By 32132 (64.180.219.241) at 4/19/2006 10:09:11 PM |
|
#7 PC sales up 13.1% last quarter. Apple Macintosh sales down 142,000 in same quarter (1,254,000 to 1,112,000)
Thats an 11% drop. Anyone want to bet by January Apple will pre-install Vista? |
| #9 By 7754 (65.27.90.2) at 4/20/2006 2:50:31 AM |
|
#6: First off, if you really think there isn't much to talk about with Vista, I strongly suggest spending awhile over at Channel9. There is so much to go into, I wouldn't even know where to begin. Another mostly good (it screws up some of the details, particularly its emphasis on the kernel's role in Windows security issues--the kernel itself has little to do with the security problems Windows has faced) article is here: http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0%2C1697%2C1931946%2C00.asp. I'm not much of a gamer, but I know a lot of folks here are, so you should check out the section on DirectX 10 ("six to eight times better performance"). DX10 will likely be enough reason itself for many people to upgrade.
As for the "Where Vista Fails" article (and I will copy this post under that article's comments section)... honestly, I find myself paying less and less attention to Paul's take on things. Personally, I feel that he (along with much of the tech media) tends to review Windows almost strictly from a consumer mindset, and furthermore, always through the prism of OS X. He puts his focus on the built-in apps, and only covers the technology "guts" on a very superficial level. I think that is a mistake. The OS X model and ecosystem is wholly different than that of Windows. For example, the most popular mail app on Windows is Outlook--not anything built into Windows. It's not a moot point necessarily, but it is of questionable value to compare how the "Windows email client" compares to the one in OS X. As I see it, the mistake Paul makes is a mistake of perspective, or rather, approach. Certainly, most business customers aren't approaching new versions of Windows comparing it OS X, but of an older version of Windows. Moreover, they aren't approaching it from the perspective of Windows alone, but a whole ecosystem made up of Windows, a host of applications, and a lot of years of user experience. Do they really care how it compares to OS X? Not in a practical sense; perphaps the enthusiast pays attention, but even then, for most it rarely weighs in on their decision. Even on the consumer side, I think Paul makes a mistake in paying too much attention to built-in apps, and not enough on built-in platform technology. Microsoft has always rather conservatively chosen what it develops for built-in apps, mostly leaving it up to partners and other 3rd parties. I agree, Vista's DVD application is pointless (so far), but in two ways: it's pointless in that it's hopelessly hobbled, but also because no one probably cares--you'll get a better DVD application pre-installed with the PC, or it will come with the DVD burner, or whatever. That model is certainly something for debate, but debating the merits of the Vista DVD application itself is probably not that worthwhile. I realize it's an evaluation of Windows alone, but it's probably not worth getting too bent out of shape over what are probably irrelevant shortcomings in reality. What is really disappointing, though, is that Paul rarely digs below the GUI and application level, and even if he does, it seems like lip service. For example, look at the threading model available in Windows vs. that of OS X--there is no comparison. OS X is seriously deficient in this area, and I've not once heard it mentioned in any tech media article. This will become more and more important and apparent as processor manufacturers turn to multicore designs to increase performance. Look at Group Policy... look at Remote Desktop (particularly the performance)... look at the .NET Framework... look at the very fine-grained file permissions... look at the true 64-bit support... look at the new networking stack... the list goes on and on. |
| #10 By 2960 (68.101.39.180) at 4/21/2006 11:25:45 AM |
|
Nope.
TL |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 306 Last | Next |
The time now is
11:07:49 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
