I have never heard MS say that about the media/os market. Do you have a cite?
They are considered abusing their monopoly in European laws, but not in the U.S. as far as the media player is concerned. The windows media player has been their for 10 years.
MS Office is the dominate force, costs substantially more than it's competing products, isn't bundled with Windows and still retains a monopoly on 90+% of the market even with freebies out there. And as you know, when OEM's sell their systems, they offer MS Office or Corel Office, and MS Office STILL costs more when choosing between the bundles.
You say "Getting your application on 95% of desktops instead of having to compete to get that spot like everyone else in the market is leveraging their existing monopoly to benefit them in another market"
Nobody is stopping you or anyone else from developing a better media player, better OS, and push their products out the door to compete. MS advertised, researched and became successful because of the business practice. It's up to you or any other company that isn't happy with the current choices to make those changes. I can think of one company....cough...lindows cough that is offering their OS with a free Office Suite. So now, if the world turned to Lindows, why would anyone want to leave the Lindows OS and OpenOffice suite when it's already there? Sounds like they want their own monopoly.
|