#5 "Microsofts thoughts should be lent more credence because of their track record"
Let's take a look at their "track record" shall we:
"In the 1990s, Microsoft adopted exclusionary licensing under which PC manufacturers were required to pay for an MS-DOS license even when the system shipped with an alternative operating system. It also used predatory tactics to price its competitors out of the market, and erected technical barriers to make it appear that competing products did not work on its operating system. An investigation by the United States Department of Justice on August 21, 1993 determined this behavior to be illegal; in a consent decree issued on July 15, 1994, Microsoft agreed to a deal in which, among other things, it would not "tie" other Microsoft products into its operating system."
"After bundling the Internet Explorer web browser into its Windows operating system in the late 1990s and acquiring a dominant share in the web browser market, an antitrust case was brought against Microsoft, and the company was convicted by a United States federal court for violating its earlier consent decree and abusing its monopoly in the desktop operating systems market. However, the proposed remedy (dividing Microsoft into two companies) was overturned on appeal, and Microsoft has since reached a settlement with the Department of Justice and some of the states which brought suit against it. Meanwhile, several class-action lawsuits filed after the conviction are still pending."
"In early 2002, Microsoft proposed a settlement to end the private lawsuits against it by donating $1 billion in money, software, services, and training, including Windows licenses and refurbished PCs, to about 12,500 underprivileged public schools. This would have been a windfall for Microsoft, not only in educating schoolchildren on Microsoft solutions but also in collecting additional license and service fees if the schools ever wanted to upgrade; but after protests from Apple Computer, which feared further loss of its educational market share, a federal judge rejected the proposed settlement."
"In 2003-2004, the European Commission investigated the bundling of media player software into Windows, a practice which rivals complained was destroying the market for their own products. Negotiations between Microsoft and the Commission broke down in March 2004, and the company was subsequently handed down a record fine of €497 million ($613 million) for its breaches of EU competition law. The ruling is subject to appeal in the European courts. Separate investigations into alleged abuses of the server market were also ongoing at the same time."
Then there's small items such as:
* Microsoft modified Win 3.1 to not run on top of DR-DOS, Caldera even had email evidence. (http://www.maxframe.com/DR/Info/fullstory/factrel.html)
* Microsoft stole Stac Electronics data compression code. (http://www.base.com/software-patents/articles/stac.html)
* Microsoft violated the contract they had with Sun over Java.
* Microsoft have modified MSN's pages to specifically render poorly on Opera. Opera proved each time that their browser and only their browser was attacked.
... and the list goes on...
The fact you consider that they should be lent more credence as a result of their track record speaks volumes!
|