| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
MSDN Subscribers: Microsoft Office System 2003 Available Now! | |
|
||
| Time: 10:59 EST/15:59 GMT | News Source: ActiveWin.com | Posted By: Brian Kvalheim | ||
|
FYI! English, French, Spanish and Italian verisons of Microsoft Office System 2003 Professional is available for download for Universal Subscribers. The download weighs in at 400.5 mb. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 325 Last | Next |
The time now is
5:19:01 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 37 (66.82.20.150) at 9/15/2003 5:04:08 PM |
| Downloading as we speak! Going pretty fast for me. |
| #2 By 1845 (12.209.152.69) at 9/15/2003 5:07:45 PM |
| Anyone remember if OneNote will be available to MSDN folks? Pro Enterprise Edition seems to have everything but ON and FP. |
| #3 By 1845 (12.209.152.69) at 9/16/2003 12:56:15 AM |
|
Jagged,
Outlook: 11.5608.5606 Excel: 11.5612.5606 Word: 11.5604.5606 PowerPoint: 11.5529.5606 I'd give you the others too, but don't want to install them. |
| #4 By 3384 (12.224.67.162) at 9/16/2003 11:37:12 AM |
|
You can see the rest of the versions here:
http://blogs.gotdotnet.com/ZHANBOS I think Woody was wrong, but not for the reason that it should be referred to as 5606. I think the overall Office System is referred to by the highest version number, which as you can see on the above page is 5614, explaining why in addition to 5612 I often saw that number bandied about too. It would make more sense to me to just call it 5606, but I don't think that's the way it is. |
| #5 By 2 (12.226.188.99) at 9/16/2003 11:41:14 AM |
| How many activations do you get on this MSDN version? |
| #6 By 3 (62.253.128.7) at 9/16/2003 12:37:57 PM |
| yeah - shame there is no FrontPage 2003 yet though...as for the final code, i'll post early impressions later today. |
| #7 By 1845 (12.209.152.69) at 9/16/2003 12:45:18 PM |
| If you've seen B2TR, RTM is pretty similar. Not great changes that I can see. |
| #8 By 135 (209.180.28.6) at 9/16/2003 1:49:41 PM |
|
Ok, downloaded Office. Haven't installed it yet. Beta looked good, like outlook. Keep 'em coming!
And what'd I tell ya about Sept 17th!!! http://www.msnbc.com/news/967357.asp?0cv=CA01 |
| #9 By 3 (62.253.128.7) at 9/16/2003 1:54:24 PM |
| Installed - all runs well, install was very fast too, with no problems (touch wood). Major improvments in Outlook, but who didn't know that already?? Other programs such as Word and Excel have lesser ones but still it improves with each new release. If anyone wants screenshots posted up let me know and I'll do it. |
| #10 By 3 (62.253.128.7) at 9/16/2003 3:31:24 PM |
| Right they'll be posted properly sometime tomorrow but we have some temp ones up at - http://www.activewin.com/reviews/previews/office2003 |
| #11 By 16302 (64.201.211.161) at 9/16/2003 5:07:02 PM |
| RTM cannot connect to my Exchange server. I have tried everything including deleting my profile and starting from scratch. It refuses to open my Exchange 2000 mailbox. |
| #12 By 135 (209.180.28.6) at 9/16/2003 5:17:53 PM |
|
Poor parker. I do feel sorry for you, but maybe if you could argue the message instead of resorting to ad hominem people might listen to you more. But then I guess it is awfully hard to support the record of failure you have been given.
|
| #13 By 135 (208.186.90.91) at 9/16/2003 11:03:43 PM |
|
parker - "Or do you think I shouldn't comment on Clarks lies? "
I think you should comment on exactly what Clark said rather than putting words in his mouth in order to build a strawman argument. If you'll do further research(i.e. not on right-wing tinfoil hat conspiracy sites) you will find exactly what Clark did say, and he didn't say what you claim. Furthermore, I think you should refute the basic charge underscored that the Whitehouse did use the 9/11 tragedy as an excuse to invade Iraq. "I've got another question for you. When Clark ordered a British General to go to war with Russia in Kosovo, do you this this was prudent? " Well now that's an interesting one, because the only reason you are aware of this incident is because Clark details the conversation in his book. Actually there is an entire chapter devoted to the Pristina airfield incident with the Russians. So it's not exactly like he's hiding anything, and he offers explanations to try to explain his position as well as that of General Jackson. Furthermore, Clark didn't order Jackson to go to war with Russia. What he ordered him to do was occupy the Pristina airfield in order to prevent the landing of Russian troops. This was per instructions from the NATO Secretary General. No war involved, this was in response to Russians lying to NATO about their troop movements. The British General overreacted and essentially through a hissy fit, but Clark calmed him down and they brought in the chain of command to decide how to resolve these differences. Since the Brits were unwilling to follow this path, they went to plan B of convincing Hungary to disallow the Russian planes through their airspace. It seems to me like you are arguing that NATO and by proxy the US should be weak when it comes to confronting countries which we have had a historical adversarial relationship with and do not entirely trust their motives. This argument therefore seems to be contrived and formulated by left-wing anti-war radicals. If you think I'm going to worry about what the disassociated left has to say about US foreign policy you're really grasping for straws. "Somehow I slept through the class session in American History where they explained just how the country was founded "on a principle of progressive taxation." " You obviously have never read Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations. The fundamental argument here is not one of progressive taxation but one of fairness, and in opposition to the regressive taxation plan that the Republican party has cast down upon America. Smith argued that each individual should pay in proportion to their wealth because it was the stability provided by government that allowed them to attain that wealth. As such it is a persons duty to support their nation. He also argued for fairness in taxation as well, so please don't try to build another strawman, it won't work. But again, you keep engaging in ad hominem to distract from the broader policy issues. A central theme in 2004 may be about character, something Bush lacks in spades and understandably why you are so afraid of a Clark candidacy, but the broader theme is going to be foreign and domestic policies that will effect this nation for a generation to come. I would actually prefer it if you would argue for failed Bush policies. Please explain why a $550 billion deficit is good for our nation and our economy, for a starter. You're more than welcome to send me email if you wish to discuss this further. I welcome the opportunity to instruct you on history and how to formulate effective arguments. |
| #14 By 1845 (12.209.152.69) at 9/17/2003 12:29:22 AM |
| Jagged, with all due respect, blue was the instigator. Parker did take the bait though. |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 325 Last | Next |
The time now is
5:19:01 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
