| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Outlook 2003 offers many new features, but it will cost you | |
|
||
| Time: 03:21 EST/08:21 GMT | News Source: TechRepublic | Posted By: Bill Roach | ||
|
The decision of which email client to use is critical for many businesses, since this is the most commonly used (and depended upon) application in the office. From a management perspective, Outlook 2003 offers some valuable new features, but you'll need to consider carefully the cost of those features when deciding whether to upgrade. Here's what you need to know in order to make the best decision in terms of Outlook 2003. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 157 Last | Next |
The time now is
8:17:30 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 7797 (63.76.44.252) at 5/22/2003 11:17:23 AM |
|
The point the author is trying to make is that in order to gain the full functionality out of Outlook 2003 you have to pay more than what you might think.
To get full functionality out of Outlook 2003 you need to be running Exchange 2003 To get full functionality out of Exchange 2003 you need to be running Windows Server 20003 This can be quite expensive if all you really want to do is upgrade your mail client! |
| #2 By 135 (209.180.28.6) at 5/22/2003 11:39:12 AM |
|
Does Outlook 2003 offer any .NET managed apis? Or is it all still the old COM interfaces?
Just curious, I have an idea which involves interfacing with Outlook and I'm wondering if maybe 2003 might not be easier to do that with. :) |
| #3 By 7797 (63.76.44.252) at 5/22/2003 11:49:31 AM |
|
SomeDork:
"You can buy outlook2003 solo, or as part of the office suite also, and at least most of the new features aren't ex2k3 specific." Thats absolutely correct and neither I or the author of the article dispute that. Like i said: "The point the author is trying to make is that in order to gain the <b>FULL</b> functionality out of Outlook 2003 you have to pay more than what you might think. " "Also I've not read anywhere that you lose ex2003 features if the underlying OS is win2k." Then maybe you should read the whole article, in particlar the last page where the author explains this to you in detail. |
| #4 By 7797 (63.76.44.252) at 5/22/2003 12:19:28 PM |
|
JaggedFlame:
"It depends on what "full functionality" is." Full functionality means to be able to use all the features the product has to offer without restriction . Full functionality has nothing to do with how you connect or what a particular person does with a program. I'd say most "joe users" only use the most basic features MS office has to offer anyways. |
| #5 By 7797 (63.76.44.252) at 5/22/2003 12:45:12 PM |
|
JaggedFlame: I am not making a big deal out of it. I just stated it. Geez. Relax.
"Why would you need Exchange and Windows Server for e-mail client functionality only?" I never said you would. Get over it. You're reading into it too much. I just made a statement, nothing more. I even said in a previous reply to you: "I'd say most "joe users" only use the most basic features MS office has to offer anyways." So take a chill pill ok? |
| #6 By 7797 (63.76.44.252) at 5/22/2003 1:48:34 PM |
|
JaggedFlame: Do I have to really point out your inability to read and comprehend?
"This can be quite expensive..." This does NOT go against my other statement: "I'd say most "joe users" only use the most basic features MS office has to offer anyways." Just because it CAN BE quite expensive doesn't mean that it WILL BE for most joe blow users. But not only Joe Blow users want to use outlook 2003 and exploit its full potential Like i said, I made a statement. You are reading too much into it. Quit being a #$@#$head. Both statements can coexist and be 100% correct side by side. "All I'm doing is questioning the validity of your statements." No you are being a troll! This post was edited by tgnb on Thursday, May 22, 2003 at 13:54. |
| #7 By 135 (209.180.28.6) at 5/22/2003 7:41:58 PM |
|
kevinu - Interesting. I'm going to have to look more into this. I have an idea for interfacing with Outlook, and if I'm going to start from scratch I might as well work with 2003.
|
| #8 By 7797 (64.244.109.161) at 5/22/2003 9:19:18 PM |
|
JaggedFlame:
I'm not going to break it down into itty bitty pices for you. You don't even know what "full functionality" means. I'm tired of explaining myself to people who don't even try or want to understand and who's goal is just to create a hostile discussion environment. |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 157 Last | Next |
The time now is
8:17:30 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
