"#1 - "Most everyone has already patched it."
How could you possibly know that? What, you assume since you patched it, and since it was on slashdot, everybody else has patched it too?
Or do you mean those most every vendor has patched it? That's what you must mean."
Yes... I was speaking of vendors creating the patches to fix the issue. I guess it was fun to watch the cogs in your brain slowly come to life and reiterate my thoughts. Thanks.
"it's not Linux, it's sendmail, but
I don't mind." Nice to know you are proud of your lies allainp. Brilliant!
The fact is: some fo the more rational minds here have tried to point out that flaws will be found no matter what (in very good software, in software that has long been poured through) and that will require a patch. As far as I can tell the process worked very well... Lots of communication, lots of coordination, etc... No patches that damage systems. No patches to patch the patch that screwed the system in the first place... No flaky security messages... No verbal attacks at the people who found it... No stalling, etc.... And this is from SendMail and over five very different OS vendors simultaneously.
Responses will vary because of the difference of systems. Apple's patch came out a little after RedHat's, Suse's, OpenBSD's, but I'd bet it was the easiest to apply.
This post was edited by sodajerk on Tuesday, March 04, 2003 at 12:44.
|