|
|
User Controls
|
New User
|
Login
|
Edit/View My Profile
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac
|
Articles
|
Forums
|
Links
|
News
|
News Search
|
Reviews
|
|
|
|
News Centers
|
Windows/Microsoft
|
DVD
|
ActiveHardware
|
Xbox
|
MaINTosh
|
News Search
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats
|
The Lobby
|
Special Events Room
|
Developer's Lounge
|
XBox Chat
|
|
|
|
FAQ's
|
Windows 98/98 SE
|
Windows 2000
|
Windows Me
|
Windows "Whistler" XP
|
Windows CE
|
Internet Explorer 6
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
Xbox
|
DirectX
|
DVD's
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips
|
Registry Tips
|
Windows 95/98
|
Windows 2000
|
Internet Explorer 4
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
Windows NT Tips
|
Program Tips
|
Easter Eggs
|
Hardware
|
DVD
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews
|
Applications
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002
|
|
Hardware
|
Intel Personal Audio Player
3000
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse
Explorer
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info
|
About This Site
|
Affiliates
|
ANet Forums
|
Contact Us
|
Default Home Page
|
Link To Us
|
Links
|
Member Pages
|
Site Search
|
Awards
|
|
|
|
Credits
©1997/2004, Active Network. All
Rights Reserved.
Layout & Design by
Designer Dream. Content
written by the Active Network team. Please click
here for full terms of
use and restrictions or read our
Privacy Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time:
10:09 EST/15:09 GMT | News Source:
Reuters |
Posted By: Robert Stein |
What do Muhammad Ali, Michael Jordan, Bill Gates and Ralph Lauren have in common?
They are all heroes of hip-hop impresario Sean "P. Diddy" Combs, who announced on Thursday a new three-year marketing and distribution deal for his Bad Boy Entertainment label with Universal Records.
|
|
#1 By
7390 (63.211.44.114)
at
2/7/2003 11:40:48 AM
|
Why is this article even here? I am loosing respect for ActiveWin daily.
|
#2 By
2 (24.54.154.183)
at
2/7/2003 1:21:46 PM
|
Not like this is a bad source - it is "reuters." sheesh!
|
#3 By
1845 (12.209.152.69)
at
2/7/2003 1:26:29 PM
|
neowin? LOL!
FYI, if you don't like the article, don't read it. Wow, something are so hard to come up with.
Filtering would be nice, but in the mean time, I'm quite able to not read something that doesn't interest me.
|
#4 By
135 (209.180.28.6)
at
2/7/2003 1:32:31 PM
|
I don't understand this reaction to this particular article.
|
#5 By
61 (65.32.170.1)
at
2/7/2003 1:33:10 PM
|
Neowin.net is only good for getting info on upcoming betas and rumors... it is otherwise purely unprofessional (read the headline for the homepage).
|
#6 By
665 (64.126.91.172)
at
2/7/2003 1:35:13 PM
|
#6, I guess we could use a P. Diddy filter :)
|
#7 By
1124 (165.170.128.68)
at
2/7/2003 1:46:46 PM
|
"Gates, founder of software maker Microsoft, was an entrepreneur who had built his business by himself, Combs said. "
Hey Soda I am curious about that too. I can clearly see the connection to MS. Could someone tell me whats with the bad reaction to this article?
|
#8 By
1845 (12.209.152.69)
at
2/7/2003 3:00:02 PM
|
I thought he was just 'Diddy' now anyway. I am far from interested in Mr. Combs characterization of Bill Gates, but if Linux can get as rediculous amount of site real estate as it does here, then why not Diddy too?
Todd, just my opinion, but one Diddy article out of 15000 prolly doesn't warrant a filter. I'd much rather not see the Register, Inquirer, etc. before I worried about a lame artist.
|
#9 By
11888 (64.230.25.50)
at
2/7/2003 4:21:19 PM
|
This just in, Kelsey Grammer enjoys Special K.
|
#10 By
7390 (63.211.44.114)
at
2/7/2003 7:31:41 PM
|
Amazing, why did I even comment? no this is getting more attention than that story about SPOT and Atari (which was really interesting to read).
I am changing my name to SodaDIDDY
|
#11 By
665 (64.126.91.172)
at
2/7/2003 7:35:57 PM
|
Bob, I know, I think filters could be good here. I just thought it would be funny to have a P. Diddy filter :) Wasn't trying to be mean.
|
#12 By
1845 (12.209.152.69)
at
2/7/2003 7:40:28 PM
|
I didn't mean to be agressive if I was. I think that'd be rather amusing too.
|
#13 By
665 (64.126.91.172)
at
2/7/2003 9:11:13 PM
|
Nah, not agressive, just wanted to make sure you knew I wasn't being mean.
|
#14 By
1295 (68.14.160.127)
at
2/8/2003 12:49:46 AM
|
LOL @ #13
|
#15 By
135 (209.180.28.6)
at
2/8/2003 2:13:07 PM
|
The reaction to this article seems akin to Pepsi pulling ads featuring Ludacris because he's profane and then replacing them with ads featuring the Osbourne family. Just another one of those things that make you go Hmm...
This post was edited by sodablue on Saturday, February 08, 2003 at 14:14.
|
|
|
|
|