Baarod, Stop? Stop what, clearing up your idiocy. Do I remember? What? Dumbass--the name OS X is not versioning. OS X is not a versioning, it is a name. The versioning is 10.2.1; this is three points, not two.. the points don't count the decimals, fool, they count the levels of designation--10 (Number 1--it's their 10th OS) POINT 2 (Number 2--somewhere between minor and substantial upgrade )POINT 1 (Number 3--bug fixes, security patches, drivers, optimization), Dumb Ass. The versioning doesn't affect the name of the OS--if it gets to version 11, 12, 45, the name of the OS is still Oh Ess Ten.
OS X is the name of the OS... It is not MacOS X, MacOS is the name for the older system--they only introduced this name around 8, I think, before then the name was simply System... Mac OS X is similar to Microsoft Windows.
Windows has always been Windows?--I guess you don't know your own history... ahh, today's youth. Of course, MS likes to rewrite history themselves... http://www.microsoft.com/windows/winhistorydesktop.mspx but it started as Interface Manager, and then Windows Manager, then Windows, then Windows for Workgroups, then you get the "modern era" of Windows/Windows NT/Windows CE...
and they apparently expect people to pronounce them "Mac OS ten version ten point two". They do? Does Microsoft "expect" me to call Win2000 "Microsoft Windows 2000 NT version 5.00.2195 Service Pack 2"? Nobody expects anything, dumbass.
What sort of versioning would you call 95, 97, Me/Millenium, 2000, XP, + SPs in between, by the way?
This post was edited by sodajerk on Wednesday, October 23, 2002 at 20:04.
|