#6, it isn't NTFS that MS tweaked in .NET server, it's the file sharing (SMB + caching techniques, etc.).
Also, NTFS is not much slower than fat32, but only a couple percent. The journaling doesn't significantly affect performance, but yes, if you want to get a 2% or 3% or so performance gain, you would look into fat32, depending on the application. Fat32 has other performance characteristics as volume sizes grow, etc., so in some applications it can actually perform worse.
If anyone has some substantiated benchmarks to back up these claims, please post links to them.
|