| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Microsoft Dynamic Memory rivals Citrix, not VMware | |
|
||
| Time: 11:50 EST/16:50 GMT | News Source: TechTarget | Posted By: John Quigley | ||
|
As the release of Service Pack 1 for Windows Server 2008 R2 nears, you can expect the virtual machine management debates to flare up again. The main topic this time around will be how Microsoft’s new Dynamic Memory feature compares to VMware’s memory overcommit. The annoying reality is that Dynamic Memory and memory overcommit are actually very different technologies designed to solve different underlying challenges in each vendor’s hypervisors. As such, it will be difficult to compare them since, philosophically, they spring from different challenges and approaches. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 126 through 139 of 139 Prev | First |
The time now is
5:05:58 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 126 through 139 of 139 Prev | First |
The time now is
5:05:58 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
