| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
What will many cores mean to future Windows releases? | |
|
||
| Time: 00:48 EST/05:48 GMT | News Source: ZDNet | Posted By: Kenneth van Surksum | ||
|
Windows and existing Microsoft programming languages work just fine with one- to four-processor PCs. But when 8- 16 and 64-core client machines become the norm — in the not-so-distant future — will Windows, C#, Visual Basic and other Microsoft applications be able to keep up? Seemingly, the answer is no. Microsoft is fully aware of this fact and is starting to make noise about how to deal with the situation. At the recent Future in Review conference, Microsoft officials told attendees that the next releases of Windows will have to be “fundamentally different” in order to accommodate future multicore machines. But that’s about all they said. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 126 through 142 of 142 Prev | First |
The time now is
4:34:04 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 126 through 142 of 142 Prev | First |
The time now is
4:34:04 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
