| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
The Windows XP Defragger--Is It Good Enough For The Enterprise? | |
|
||
| Time: 10:15 EST/15:15 GMT | News Source: E-Mail | Posted By: Byron Hinson | ||
|
After initial hopes that Windows NT wouldn't need to be defragmented, Microsoft soon recognized that its NTFS was at least just as much subject to fragmentation as FAT file systems. As a result, the company included a free defragmentation utility in both the server and workstation editions of Windows 2000. This entirely manual utility was better than having nothing at all, but proved unsuitable for enterprise deployment. In Windows XP, therefore, Microsoft made a few upgrades to the defragmenter for XP Home, Professional and Server editions in attempt to make it more thorough and less limited in an enterprise setting. This article examines what is new with this built in XP utility and puts it under the microscope to determine if has value in a corporate deployment or should be ignored as a viable solution for network-wide defragmentation concerns. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 551 through 572 of 572 Prev | First |
The time now is
1:26:03 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 551 through 572 of 572 Prev | First |
The time now is
1:26:03 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
