| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Going Mobile à la AMD: Low-Voltage Athlon XP-M vs. Pentium-M (Banias) | |
|
||
| Time: 12:24 EST/17:24 GMT | News Source: Toms Hardware Guide | Posted By: Jared Evans | ||
|
The standard version of the Athlon XP-M mobile processor has already shown its power and energy efficiency (PowerNow! technology) in several tests of all-in-one notebooks (Compaq Evo N1015 v, IGP320M, Vaio NVR-23). However, what are known in AMD jargon as the "mainstream Athlon XP-M models" have not been able to make any inroads into the 'thin and light' category, because their maximum thermal power is 35 watts (V CC =1.45 v). On the other hand, the low-voltage models of the Athlon XP-M available now only require a maximum operating voltage of 1.25 v. Because of the lower input power, it has been possible to reduce the maximum thermal power loss by almost 30 percent, to 25 watts. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 401 through 422 of 422 Prev | First |
The time now is
5:16:28 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 401 through 422 of 422 Prev | First |
The time now is
5:16:28 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
