|
|
User Controls
|
New User
|
Login
|
Edit/View My Profile
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac
|
Articles
|
Forums
|
Links
|
News
|
News Search
|
Reviews
|
|
|
|
News Centers
|
Windows/Microsoft
|
DVD
|
ActiveHardware
|
Xbox
|
MaINTosh
|
News Search
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats
|
The Lobby
|
Special Events Room
|
Developer's Lounge
|
XBox Chat
|
|
|
|
FAQ's
|
Windows 98/98 SE
|
Windows 2000
|
Windows Me
|
Windows "Whistler" XP
|
Windows CE
|
Internet Explorer 6
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
Xbox
|
DirectX
|
DVD's
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips
|
Registry Tips
|
Windows 95/98
|
Windows 2000
|
Internet Explorer 4
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
Windows NT Tips
|
Program Tips
|
Easter Eggs
|
Hardware
|
DVD
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews
|
Applications
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002
|
|
Hardware
|
Intel Personal Audio Player
3000
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse
Explorer
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info
|
About This Site
|
Affiliates
|
ANet Forums
|
Contact Us
|
Default Home Page
|
Link To Us
|
Links
|
Member Pages
|
Site Search
|
Awards
|
|
|
|
Credits
©1997/2004, Active Network. All
Rights Reserved.
Layout & Design by
Designer Dream. Content
written by the Active Network team. Please click
here for full terms of
use and restrictions or read our
Privacy Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time:
00:00 EST/05:00 GMT | News Source:
ZDNet |
Posted By: Todd Richardson |
In a new suit that echoes earlier charges from Netscape, Sun Microsystems and others, Microsoft is accused of bullying companies out of using Burst.com products and stealing the streaming company's technology.
The suit, filed Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, claims Microsoft's upcoming video encoding and decoding product, Corona, includes Burst's patented video-delivery technology. The company also alleges that Microsoft pressured partners and customers, including Intel and RealNetworks, into dropping support for Burst technology. And it claims Microsoft intentionally caused Burst's products to be incompatible with Windows software.
In the complaint, lawyers for Burst said Microsoft's actions have caused the company "serious and continuing damage and have deprived consumers of valuable new technologies that threatened to disturb Microsoft's strategy to maintain and expand its operating system's dominance to the delivery of high-quality video over the Internet."
Burst said Microsoft gained access to its streaming technology while the two companies were trying to negotiate a deal for the rights to it. Burst said those talks fell through and instead Microsoft took the technology and put it in Corona.
|
|
#1 By
3339 (64.175.41.224)
at
6/20/2002 4:07:50 AM
|
Boy...
yet another company that entered a technology agreement with Microsoft that exposed their innovative technology to Microsoft which Microsoft then walked away from before the other company benefited and then shortly after Microsoft debuted a similar technology
yeah, it's just a coincidence, and so are all the other instances of this behavior
whether or not a legally winnable (is that a word) case of patent infringement occurred, do you all really dismiss every one of these "coincidences" over the last fifteen years as propaganda?
|
#2 By
1124 (165.170.128.66)
at
6/20/2002 9:11:16 AM
|
OK let me bite... How many times has MS lost one on these cases?
When you are at the top of your game, sometimes your competitors use desperate means. Sun is a prime example.
BTW, guilt is not determined by the number of accusations. Lets see what the courts says first.
|
#3 By
135 (209.180.28.6)
at
6/20/2002 10:39:45 AM
|
#3 - Good point.
|
#4 By
61 (65.32.168.97)
at
6/20/2002 11:55:15 AM
|
Again, a thread full of people who need to come to reality.
Last time I checked in this country (USA) you are innocent until proven guilty.
This post was edited by CPUGuy on Thursday, June 20, 2002 at 12:08.
|
#5 By
1474 (160.125.216.118)
at
6/20/2002 12:37:03 PM
|
Microsoft, Sun, AOL, Walmart, whom is the next president. Noted the pass rulers AT&T, Enron, Standard Oil, Southern Railroad. It's all about money, stop wasting your time - that's me and just buy what you want. For you have right to by what you want, I wish "they" would stop telling me what "they" think I should, just stop wasting my tax money.
|
#6 By
20 (24.243.51.87)
at
6/20/2002 5:36:08 PM
|
#13: Yeah! The bastards! Just like Henry Ford! He stole the concept of the "wheel'!
Come on, at that time, everyone was trying to build a Windowed GUI for their OSes, it just happens that Apple go there first, but MS had been working on it and thinking about it long before Apple released the first MacOS. Besides, Xerox had them all beat, so by your illogical way of thinking, Apple copied it from Xerox.
If you want an example of a company trying to steal or hijack technology, look at what Sun is trying to do with the SOAP/Web Services working group. They want to be inducted as a "Founding Member" 2 or so years AFTER it was founded.
|
#7 By
61 (65.32.168.97)
at
6/21/2002 12:48:06 AM
|
You say that Microsoft "copied" Apple, even though the interfaces were NOTHING alike.
Why does Microsoft get blamed for "copying" from Apple. There were other contenders back then as well, and even today new OS's come out that have a windowing UI, you don't say how they copied Apple.
You also don't say that companies like Lindows, the KDE or Gnome group, the FVWM, et al copied Microsoft's specific UI designs that they spent years researching and developing.
When you start talking about how MS copied/copies Apple, you truely show your idiotic bias against the company.
|
#8 By
61 (65.32.168.97)
at
6/21/2002 12:53:33 AM
|
Actually, Jagged, it doesn't.
The only OS's that really have the potential are MacOS X based (read, post-OSX) and BeOS based (such as OpenBeOS).
|
#9 By
6253 (12.237.192.198)
at
6/21/2002 12:39:29 PM
|
The funny thing is that every industry EXCEPT the software industry has embraced the notion that somebody can come up with an idea and somebody else can improve on it, and then somebody else can improve upon that, and this is all very good because it causes the state of the art to move forward in logical ways. As long as your implementation is merely inspired rather than copied, it's considered business as usual in the tire industry, the laundry products industry, the publishing industry, the building materials industry, the accounting industry, the pharmaceutical industry, and on and on. But in the geek world, people seem to think that it's good to come up with sufficiently differently technologies to confuse users, obsolete data, confound integration, etc. all in the name of claiming/receiving "credit" for a simple idea.
The legal system provides relief for those who have been copied. At the same time, the legal system also encourages people to go after those with deep pockets, regardless of claim.
|
|
|
|
|