| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Windows 7 reliability scorecard - looking good! | |
|
||
| Time: 07:45 EST/12:45 GMT | News Source: ZDNet | Posted By: Andre Da Costa | ||
|
I’ve been running various builds of Windows 7 on a number of systems here at the lab since December of last year. Over time, Windows 7 became my default OS on several systems that are in daily use. During that time I’ve captured a lot of real-world reliability data for the OS. I’m going to be concentrating on data gathered from three heavily used Windows 7 systems. I’m going to focus on Windows 7 reliability data only for the RC (Release Candidate) and RTM (Release to Manufacturing) releases of the OS. I have data going back much further than that, but it’s the final release that people are most interested in. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 307 Last | Next |
The time now is
7:38:51 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 9/28/2009 9:51:09 AM |
|
This sounds like the Google Gmail outage story from last week: "I've only had a few crashes with it so I know Windows reliability is improving!"
Note to twitchy Microbots: I'm commenting on the similarities in the two articles' approach. I'm not making any comments on Win7 reliability. Step away from the 'Write Comment' link. |
| #2 By 7754 (206.169.247.2) at 9/28/2009 1:17:32 PM |
|
It would have been similar if he was extolling the virtues of crashing (and, for what it's worth, he didn't have any Windows crashes, only application crashes and driver issues)--that we can be thankful for them since they should improve reliability. Instead, he was indicating his results for Windows 7's reliability record--something the previous article also did not do (for Gmail).
Interesting also that you're the first (eager) to post on this. ;) |
| #3 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 9/28/2009 2:02:01 PM |
| #2: I'm the only one awake at that time of the morning. I'm often the first to post on articles that interest me. |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 307 Last | Next |
The time now is
7:38:51 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
