| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Windows .Net servers hold their own against Unix | |
|
||
| Time: 12:30 EST/17:30 GMT | News Source: InfoWorld | Posted By: Robert Stein | ||
|
Thanks Stefan! "MICROSOFT'S ONGOING CRUSADE to establish a firm foothold in the enterprise got a little more traction recently from a benchmark test conducted by Accenture that show Windows .Net servers compared favorably with Unix-based servers running mission-critical applications. The benchmark, conducted in Accenture's High Performance Scalability Lab, compared actual performance data from a manufacturing company now running SAP's R/3 data base on Unix with those results from running R/3 on Microsoft's Windows .Net server." | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 313 Last | Next |
The time now is
6:44:28 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 2332 (129.21.145.80) at 5/1/2002 2:20:05 PM |
| Wow. Neato. I wish, however, that they would provide more information about the benchmarks themselves. |
| #2 By 2960 (156.80.64.135) at 5/1/2002 2:29:08 PM |
|
If they told you, they'd have to kill you.
We're not supposed to know. We're just supposed to absorb it as fact. :) TL |
| #3 By 1642 (205.177.133.222) at 5/1/2002 3:47:17 PM |
|
Well, # 4, in one paragraph it says the testing was on a Windows .NET Server, but on another paragraph it said Windows Advanced Server. So it is hard to say from the article if it was Win2K or a beta of Windows .NET
But you are right. If this was tested on 900 MHz processors, then the 2.4 Gig Xeons that are soon to arrive, and the Itanium should really extend the lead. |
| #4 By 531 (66.188.129.246) at 5/1/2002 4:06:08 PM |
| I'm assuming that they meant Windows .NET Enterprise Server when they said Windows Advanced Server... may have just been a mix-up in the naming scheme. |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 313 Last | Next |
The time now is
6:44:28 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
