| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Will Windows 7 get a new name for its release? | |
|
||
| Time: 00:04 EST/05:04 GMT | News Source: ZDNet | Posted By: Kenneth van Surksum | ||
|
Ed Bott: I’m reading more and more about Windows 7 lately as PDC approaches and Microsoft begins revealing more snippets of information about its most secretive product ever. In most of that coverage, I’ve noticed an assumption that Windows 7 is going to be the final name of the product. I’ve been guilty of leaping to that conclusion myself.
| ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 217 Last | Next |
The time now is
2:44:26 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 2201 (82.45.132.196) at 10/9/2008 4:20:40 AM |
|
What kind of non-story is this? Why would Microsoft keep the name Windows 7? This author has obviously forgotton all the previous versions of Windows (since 95 at least) which was described using their codename until soon before release. Windows Vista was known as Longhorn for years till they announced a formal name soon before it was released. So it stands to reason that Microsoft will announce a proper name at some point next year.
Idiot! |
| #2 By 17855 (205.167.180.132) at 10/9/2008 8:05:59 AM |
| Did you click on the link and read the non-story? Then the author succeeded in what he wanted you to do. |
| #3 By 3453 (140.254.63.2) at 10/9/2008 1:23:37 PM |
|
I think Vista ME is available.
HeartMan |
| #4 By 143 (96.28.64.138) at 10/9/2008 2:36:33 PM |
| I'm betting on "Vista Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious" edition. |
| #5 By 2960 (70.177.180.170) at 10/9/2008 5:06:06 PM |
| As long as there are DEEP DEEP discounts for those of us who paid $400 for the full version of un-ultimate, I don't care what they call it. |
| #6 By 37 (192.251.125.85) at 10/10/2008 7:39:23 AM |
| Why can't they call it Windows 7? Remember Windows 3.11? |
| #7 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 10/10/2008 10:37:44 AM |
|
Windows 7 or Windows 2007 sound fine to me.
|
| #8 By 37 (192.251.125.85) at 10/10/2008 12:29:22 PM |
|
Or how about ubuntumandrakelinuxredhatcorellinux.
Much more consumer friendly ;) |
| #9 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 10/10/2008 12:49:16 PM |
| Um, make that Windows 2009. |
| #10 By 23275 (71.91.9.16) at 10/10/2008 4:33:40 PM |
| Steven Sinofsky is running things - it will be Windows 2010 (even if released late in 2009) - though it should be Windows Vista R2 (less they take a giant dump on the heads of partners and users who have moved Vista despite the drubbing each has fairly, or unfairly taken on behalf of MS). |
| #11 By 12071 (124.168.135.119) at 10/10/2008 10:44:57 PM |
|
#3 I thought the current version was Vista ME!
#6 Because most (majority of?) software companies have stopped using version numbers when marketing their newest version, e.g. Adobe, Symantec, Microsoft etc etc. #10 "R2" isn't a consumer-friendly term - at least not one that you'd print on the side of a box. Maybe they can do a Street Fighter thing with it... "Super Windows Vista II Turbo" I'd bet on them dumping the "Vista" name as quickly as they can with this version of Windows. |
| #12 By 17996 (66.235.18.153) at 10/11/2008 3:07:21 AM |
| #6 -- because it isn't Windows 7.0... it's really just 6.1. Sinofsky's "every new version has a new, .0 version number" philosophy from Office just doesn't work over in the Windows side -- 6.1 is a very proper descriptor of "7"'s changes over Vista. |
| #13 By 2201 (78.32.103.51) at 10/12/2008 3:29:24 PM |
|
#10 and #11 They obviously won't be calling it Vista, considering all the previous versions of Windows since 95 have had different names. For example they didn't carry on the XP name, did they? Or the Me name? Microsoft have never reused names for new versions of Windows so "R2" is out. It's 100% guaranteed that they will be calling it something different, just like they always have done.
#all - they won't be calling it after a year, they gave that up since Windows 98SE. Naming it after a particular year is reserved for the server versions of Windows and has been since Windows 2000. |
| #14 By 28801 (71.58.225.185) at 10/12/2008 5:35:24 PM |
| They could call it Mojave! |
| #15 By 2201 (82.45.132.196) at 10/14/2008 4:04:07 AM |
| And guess what? Microsoft announced it WILL be called Windows 7. That's a turn up for the books. |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 217 Last | Next |
The time now is
2:44:26 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
