The Active Network
ActiveMac Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise  
 

  *  

  Microsoft Proposes Acquisition of Yahoo! for $31 per Share
Time: 06:10 EST/11:10 GMT | News Source: Microsoft Press Release | Posted By: Robert Stein

Microsoft Corp. today announced that it has made a proposal to the Yahoo! Inc. Board of Directors to acquire all the outstanding shares of Yahoo! common stock for per share consideration of $31 representing a total equity value of approximately $44.6 billion. Microsoft’s proposal would allow the Yahoo! shareholders to elect to receive cash or a fixed number of shares of Microsoft common stock, with the total consideration payable to Yahoo! shareholders consisting of one-half cash and one-half Microsoft common stock. The offer represents a 62 percent premium above the closing price of Yahoo! common stock on Jan. 31, 2008.

“We have great respect for Yahoo!, and together we can offer an increasingly exciting set of solutions for consumers, publishers and advertisers while becoming better positioned to compete in the online services market,” said Steve Ballmer, chief executive officer of Microsoft. “We believe our combination will deliver superior value to our respective shareholders and better choice and innovation to our customers and industry partners.”

“Our lives, our businesses, and even our society have been progressively transformed by the Web, and Yahoo! has played a pioneering role by building compelling, high-scale services and infrastructure,” said Ray Ozzie, chief software architect at Microsoft. “The combination of these two great teams would enable us to jointly deliver a broad range of new experiences to our customers that neither of us would have achieved on our own.”

The online advertising market is growing at a very fast pace, from over $40 billion in 2007 to nearly $80 billion by 2010. The resulting benefits of scale along with the associated capital costs for advertising platform providers make this a time of industry consolidation and convergence. Today this market is increasingly dominated by one player. Together, Microsoft and Yahoo! can offer a competitive choice while better fulfilling the needs of customers and partners.

<%=GetPoll(118)%>
Write Comment
Return to News

  Displaying 1 through 25 of 330
Last | Next
  The time now is 12:02:04 PM ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us
#1 By 28801 (65.90.202.10) at 2/1/2008 7:40:17 AM
Paying a premium for a company on the decline doesn't make sense to me.

#2 By 2960 (72.196.195.185) at 2/1/2008 8:08:24 AM
The Feds will never let this happen.

TL

#3 By 3 (86.1.38.147) at 2/1/2008 11:34:31 AM
Certainly seems a strange bid - buying a company going downhill, I know MSN search has been dire in terms of users - but buying this one isn't going to solve all their problems or mean Google lose customers either. It isn't that the Yahoo services are much different from the ones Microsoft offer already either. Oh well, there must be some logic somewhere.

#4 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 2/1/2008 11:38:23 AM
MS can't compete in the Search and Ad markets, so they will 'innovate' by buying Yahoo at its weakest. What MS plans to do with their Live search and MSN remains a mystery, as there is a lot of overlap between MS and Yahoo.

#5 By 16045 (208.250.9.25) at 2/1/2008 11:41:17 AM
Maybe I'm just ignorant... but this seems really stupid.

#6 By 8556 (12.208.163.138) at 2/1/2008 1:36:01 PM
Maybe part of the strategy is to build up the separate areas of MS, gaming, Windows and Office, and Windows Live and then to split MS into three spinoffs to increase stockholder value. Buying Yahoo and not doing any aggressive restructuring of MS seems quite foolish. Stockholders agree as MS shares dropped after the announcement.

#7 By 3653 (65.80.181.153) at 2/1/2008 2:17:39 PM
Reminder: The offer of $31/whare is approximately the price of Yahoo back in May 2007, when MSFT first offered to buy them. Of course, no one knows what they were willing to pay in May 2007, but it was surely MUCH higher. So, assuming the deal goes through... yahoo's recently departed CEO will have cost yahoo shareholders Billion$, as in >$20B.

Sincerely,

a guy that bought yhoo on 1/23 for $20.44

This post was edited by mooresa56 on Friday, February 01, 2008 at 14:19.

#8 By 3653 (65.80.181.153) at 2/1/2008 2:22:26 PM
I'll reserve judgement on the deal, as its just too large to get the mind around.

But to address a few points from earlier comments:

"buying a company going downhill"

I think the idea is to buy the company while the value is still there. And they obviously think the company has enough value to warrant the price offered. Lucky them, in that the price is a ton cheaper now than just a short while ago (see my previous post).

latch - whistle a new tune once in awhile. you're boring.


#9 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 2/1/2008 2:34:48 PM
#8: Sorry, truth is all I've got to work with.

#10 By 1896 (68.153.171.248) at 2/1/2008 4:35:58 PM
I am puzzled by this move: while I agree with mooresa that yahoo has a value I am not sure what the value could have been, without MS bid, 3 o 6 months from now.
IMO there are no doubts that yahoo is a falling star and the reason is that the manangement announced some big plan to restructure the company business model... but never eplained what this plan was and/or beginning to implement it.
In other words yahoo lacks a strategic plan and that is the reason why the market was punishing it.
As far as MS is concern I agree with the comments other have made here: I see few sinergies and a lot of overlaps between the two companies.
Being a MS stockholder I hope that MS executives are not becoming obsessed with Google up to the point to make irrational moves; it is true that I heard rumors about google considering a hostile takeover of yahoo so the bid by MS could be seen as a pre-emptive move.
Bottom line I think that with 46 billions you could have enough money to build from scratch a new search engine. :-)

#11 By 3653 (65.80.181.153) at 2/1/2008 8:40:59 PM
Ok, so we can all agree that putting a value on this is difficult. I thought I'd throw out another worthless try, however.

Just went to wikipedia...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acquisitions_by_Yahoo%21

and it shows Yahoo's acquisitions. Only about quarter of them have values of the deals, but even those total to over $15B. So, perhaps $30-$50B for all the deals combined.

Whats that analysis worth? Zero. What did you pay for it? Zero. Enjoy.

#12 By 3653 (65.80.181.153) at 2/1/2008 8:46:39 PM
latch&truth... nah, that doesn't pair well at all.

fwiw, growth through acquisition isn't exactly exclusive to microsoft.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Google_acquisitions

#13 By 88850 (221.128.181.64) at 2/2/2008 1:32:20 AM
They'll use their search and throw away whatever competing technologies they have. I dont approve of the deal simply because there is too much of overlap and many technologies will now simply be wasted, dead and gone, many of the past efforts and money spent will be wasted and I'm very doubtful MS will integrate all of Yahoo! technologies into their own products. If so many technologies are going to get getting killed in the acqusition, I don't think it's good for consumers.

#14 By 9589 (71.49.188.113) at 2/2/2008 5:58:38 AM
Microsoft just pissed $43B down the toilet.

How many of you that don't use either Microsoft's or Yahoo!'s search are now going to use the combined company's search instead of Googles'? Yeah thought so . . .

And, just when Microsoft was on its way to getting the EU antitrust mess behind them, they open themselves up to more scruting, fines, and poor goodwill.

Unbelievable!

#15 By 98591 (24.192.185.252) at 2/2/2008 1:23:39 PM
Guys,
This is just a staging ground. Word is that next year MS will put a bid in for AT&T - and then Verizon. Wait until the bandwidth wars are over!

#16 By 28801 (65.90.202.10) at 2/2/2008 5:33:21 PM
#15: Staging ground for what exactly? I can understand a move for AT&T or Verizon as that would be expansion into new areas of business. But for 45 billion, this Yahoo thing doesn't make much sense especially as a staging ground. There is too much overlap in core compentencies.


#17 By 3653 (65.80.181.153) at 2/2/2008 7:15:03 PM
"Microsoft just pissed $43B down the toilet. "

Come on JD... you dont think Yahoo is worth ANYTHING? Not even 10 bucks?

#18 By 1896 (68.153.171.248) at 2/3/2008 5:19:12 AM
Mooresa, of course Yahoo is worth more than $10 per share, at least for now...
In my opininion the issue is not what the shares are worth because MS did not make a financial investment but an operative one.
As for buying At&T and Verizon this could be an intriguing scenario but personally I would move in a completely different direction:
1) bid in the wireless auction for the airwaves the US government is going to release, create a MS branded smartphone (MS hardware is top quality, both in quality and customer service) which OS would be upgradable without the need to buy a new phone.
2) Build an optic fiber network to finally close the gap between the average, and overpriced, connection speed here and what is available in Europe.
3) Give a real overhaul in Windows UI, hopefully in time for Windows 7.Check how, in spite of early criticism, office 2007 sales are flying. Save the "Windows" name for brand recognition but get rid of the windows, they are so old!!
Check this article about the OS GUI, I found it very, very interesting and educative:

http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070511/taking-the-windows-out-of-windows/



This post was edited by Fritzly on Sunday, February 03, 2008 at 05:21.

#19 By 39852 (206.47.191.243) at 2/3/2008 11:26:20 AM
Ok, first they said "What we're saying is that in six months' time we'll be more relevant in the U.S. market place than Google," Neil Holloway, Microsoft president for Europe, Middle East and Africa.

Then they backtracked on that and said: "We won't try to predict the progress of our competitors and so we won't forecast when we might take the lead, but this is a long term game and we are committed to helping drive the next wave of innovation in search for our customers," Ken Moss, general manager for Web search at MSN.

Now they're just going to buy a search engine instead? And claim that consolidation will eliminate overhead? Like when they bought Hotmail, they're probably going to increase overhead by converting everything on Yahoo! from OSS (PHP - why would they rely on a technology where they have to play catch-up with?, BSD/Linux - they are going to put their money where their mouth is and run Windows obviously).

Doesn't sound like a good deal for MS unless they just care about taking down Google at any cost, but you don't go cutting off your nose to spite your face.

#20 By 28801 (71.58.231.46) at 2/3/2008 9:40:12 PM
#18: "MS hardware is top quality, both in quality and customer service"


What! Even Parker wouldn't say that.

#21 By 9589 (71.49.188.113) at 2/3/2008 11:50:39 PM
mooresa56, Yahoo has about 4 dollars a share in cash/cash equivalents and owns or has part interest in several Chinese search and auction web sites worth another 10 dollars a share. Plus they have physical plant in terms of data centers worth probably another five dollars. Add in personnel and the attendant expertise in their fields and the market had the company priced about right at $18 a share recently. So, Microsoft paid nearly twice as much as the company is worth.

What Microsoft didn't get was a better search engine than they have on their own. And, both theirs and Yahoo!'s search were on the decline. Additionally, Yahoo! has been touting an ad engine that would capture revenue better. The numbers from their last quarterly report leads one to believe that isn't working.

Is the recent purchase by Microsoft of the ad company and now Yahoo! the "special sauce" that will allow the combined company to match or exceed Google's ability to turn search in revenue? I don't know. But, I wouldn't bet against Google in this area. Just as I wouldn't bet against VMware in virtualization.

This isn't IE against Netscape. The above are real players with real revenue streams and they both have a lock in their nitch areas. Microsoft is going up against formidible competition.

The wild card is Gate's exit in another quarter. Is Ballmer up to the job? I don't know that either.



#22 By 37047 (99.241.35.182) at 2/4/2008 7:06:47 AM
This isn't about technology, in the larger scale of the deal. This is about advertisers and customers, and Microsoft wants Yahoo's advertisers to give their money to Microsoft, and Microsoft wants Yahoo's customer base to view those advertisements. This is completely about advertising, and almost nothing about search. And for that, Microsoft is willing to pay a 60+% premium for Yahoo.

#23 By 28801 (65.90.202.10) at 2/4/2008 7:26:51 AM
#22: With Yahoo on the decline, how much is that advertising worth?

#24 By 37047 (216.191.227.68) at 2/4/2008 8:18:03 AM
#23: Microsoft seems to think it is worth something. I personally have no idea how well or poorly Yahoo does in the advertising arena, other than not as well as Google.

#25 By 28801 (65.90.202.10) at 2/4/2008 9:19:58 AM
#24: No one is denying that there is value in Yahoo. My point is that its value is declining so it stands to reason that the revenue from ads is declining as well. What makes Microsoft think they can right this ship when they can hardly compete in this area to begin with? I really don’t have any faith that the Microsoft brain trust can stop the Yahoo ship from listing and ultimately sinking. Do you?

Write Comment
Return to News
  Displaying 1 through 25 of 330
Last | Next
  The time now is 12:02:04 PM ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us
User name and password:

 

  *  
  *   *