| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Windows 2000 servers cheaper to run than Unix | |
|
||
| Time: 14:17 EST/19:17 GMT | News Source: VNUNet | Posted By: Adrian Latinak | ||
|
A new survey has found that Intel-based servers running Windows 2000 and trusted with key back-office applications are significantly cheaper than Unix servers. The cost of running back-office servers on Windows and Intel technology is around half that of Unix servers, a new report has found. According to the survey of US medium and large sized enterprises, over a three-year ownership period, companies can expect to see 46 per cent lower costs associated with acquiring, maintaining and running a Windows 2000 server over a Unix/Risc machine. "We expected there to be a cost advantage, but not this high," said Thomas Manter, research director at Aberdeen Group and author of the report. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 211 Last | Next |
The time now is
9:06:12 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 2332 (129.21.145.80) at 4/10/2002 5:20:56 PM |
| #2 - Actually... this is *really* good for MSFT. Their goal has always been to create software so easy to use that anybody could do it. Obviously, they're on their way. |
| #2 By 135 (209.180.28.6) at 4/10/2002 8:01:08 PM |
|
#20 - Because:
A. Most companies don't actually use Unix on Intel. B. It wouldn't be as exciting of numbers. |
| #3 By 4209 (163.192.21.3) at 4/11/2002 11:28:11 AM |
| #18, I am a Win2K MCSE with two jobs. One in the field full-time and one instructing. Although I had my Admin job before I was an MCSE, and I got the MCSE just to see the diff. between NT and 2K. Not to get more money or keep my job. Unfortunately the NT 4.0 track was far to easy to get the MCSE and flooded the market, that and these schools pumping out 15-20 MCSE's every 6 months is killing it as well. |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 211 Last | Next |
The time now is
9:06:12 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
