| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Microsoft Reveals Novell E-Mails | |
|
||
| Time: 00:00 EST/05:00 GMT | News Source: Associated Press | Posted By: Todd Richardson | ||
|
Microsoft attempted to show Wednesday that network software maker Novell's business strategy was linked to its participation in efforts to punish Microsoft for antitrust violations. In one e-mail released by Microsoft lawyers, Novell chief executive Jack Messman said the company was looking for a "Trojan horse" in order to get a piece of Novell software installed on Microsoft operating systems. "We need to infiltrate the Microsoft strategy," Messman wrote in a December 2001 e-mail. "After we get in, we can then proliferate." | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 306 Last | Next |
The time now is
2:38:49 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 20 (24.243.32.227) at 3/28/2002 12:14:07 AM |
| But I thought Microsoft was the only evil corporations and that all these other companies were so poor and innocent? |
| #2 By 2332 (129.21.145.80) at 3/28/2002 1:15:09 PM |
| #5 - This is entered as evidence... if there is something fishy about the e-mails, we will be sure to hear all about it. |
| #3 By 2 (24.54.153.167) at 3/28/2002 5:14:15 PM |
| Why not Jagged? I can make a glove appear not to fit too...I think he did it :) He even had cuts on his hands! What about the footprints of the one of the kind Bruno Magli shoes!! |
| #4 By 2459 (66.25.124.8) at 3/28/2002 7:13:25 PM |
|
What about the Police videotapes of the scene that showed scene contamination? Let's stay on topic though, please. The news media has already played this and other topics to death (no pun intended).
By the way, if you want to see something funny, watch the Scott McNeely videos on CNET. You'll love his comments on .NET and "calling other companies on using proprietary standards (Funny, I thought Java was one of the biggest proprietary standards around). How can this guy still draw an audience? http://news.com.com/2014-1089-0.html I know, I'm breaking my own request to stay on topic. Sue me. (pun intended) :-) This post was edited by n4cer on Thursday, March 28, 2002 at 19:16. |
| #5 By 2332 (129.21.145.80) at 3/28/2002 11:04:08 PM |
|
#10 - "Evidence that showed his guilt yet he plays golf today..."
Um, ok. You "know" that OJ is guilty, and you "know" the issues surrounding the case. Doesn't that suggest exactly what I said? That the truth will emerge? "Another example is Microsoft trying to show performance issues when removing IE and they used different machines. Microsoft would obviously only enter evidence that (hopefully) HELPS their case." Glad to see there are still plenty of people who still believe Microsoft was being nefarious. Even the judge accepted that Microsoft didn't mean to mislead anybody. In addition, the prosecution is free to enter any evidence they wish to refute Microsoft's claim. So your "point" is moot. "Maybe the e-mail in question was followed by others that showed that it was a joke among tech-engineers (doubt it but who knows)." Fine, then that will likely be discovered and entered into evidence by the prosecution. Ya know, this is how our legal system works... would you expect any different? "I would just like to see evidence from both parties in question and make my humble opinion from that." That's the job of the prosecution... again, if it exists, I'm sure they will find it. If they don't enter anything, maybe, just maybe, Microsoft is right. (Satan forbid!) |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 306 Last | Next |
The time now is
2:38:49 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
