|
|
User Controls
|
New User
|
Login
|
Edit/View My Profile
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac
|
Articles
|
Forums
|
Links
|
News
|
News Search
|
Reviews
|
|
|
|
News Centers
|
Windows/Microsoft
|
DVD
|
ActiveHardware
|
Xbox
|
MaINTosh
|
News Search
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats
|
The Lobby
|
Special Events Room
|
Developer's Lounge
|
XBox Chat
|
|
|
|
FAQ's
|
Windows 98/98 SE
|
Windows 2000
|
Windows Me
|
Windows "Whistler" XP
|
Windows CE
|
Internet Explorer 6
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
Xbox
|
DirectX
|
DVD's
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips
|
Registry Tips
|
Windows 95/98
|
Windows 2000
|
Internet Explorer 4
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
Windows NT Tips
|
Program Tips
|
Easter Eggs
|
Hardware
|
DVD
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews
|
Applications
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002
|
|
Hardware
|
Intel Personal Audio Player
3000
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse
Explorer
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info
|
About This Site
|
Affiliates
|
ANet Forums
|
Contact Us
|
Default Home Page
|
Link To Us
|
Links
|
Member Pages
|
Site Search
|
Awards
|
|
|
|
Credits
©1997/2004, Active Network. All
Rights Reserved.
Layout & Design by
Designer Dream. Content
written by the Active Network team. Please click
here for full terms of
use and restrictions or read our
Privacy Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time:
18:50 EST/23:50 GMT | News Source:
Ars Technica |
Posted By: Jonathan Tigner |
Google will soon be rounding out its collection of web-based office apps with a presentation application, according to Google CEO Eric Schmidt. Schmidt spoke at this week's Web 2.0 Expo in San Francisco, which is where he announced the company's plans for the presentation app. He did not give a time frame for when the app would be released to the public, but a post on the Official Google Blog confirmed the announcement and said that they expect the app to be released this summer.
Currently, Google Docs & Spreadsheets offers word processing and spreadsheet creation and editing, similar to that of Microsoft Office and other office suites. However, one advantage that Microsoft maintained over Google was the availability of PowerPoint, the nearly ubiquitous presentation creation app that is bundled with most versions of Office. The addition of a Google app to mirror PowerPoint's capabilities will complete the missing link in making Google Docs into something approaching a fully-fledged alternative to Office.
Google will not be building the application from scratch. They instead have acquired Tonic Systems, the creators of Java-based PowerPoint automation products. "They have some great technology for presentation creation and document conversion, and it will be a great addition as we add presentation sharing and collaboration capabilities to Google Docs & Spreadsheets," wrote Engineering Director Sam Schillace on the company's blog.
|
|
#1 By
32132 (64.180.219.241)
at
4/17/2007 9:10:31 PM
|
Never, ever use Google for anything remotely private or confidential. It all goes into their big database and is sold to paying customers.
|
#2 By
23275 (24.179.4.158)
at
4/17/2007 10:54:53 PM
|
#1, Yeah, the interesting thing about Google to me is how they get away with taking others' intellectual property and how they use it to make a profit.
Take leading healthcare providers that have worked decades in their areas of specialty - they have a site with their IP on it and Google uses that content and sells advertising around it, making billions. Do they pay the doctor? Nope. Not without the doctor's active participation and then the doctor's take is tiny. It's an interesting legal perspective and one that is eventually going to be formalized. I added some of their code in an on-going experiment to understand this better - I remain very uninformed and concerned.
Similarly, what of Google's network - parallel to the public networks? This is interesting, too and one is never sure of what they are getting into, much less actually viewing. Perhaps the most concerning behavior is the contextual reading of email texts to embed "relevant advertising" around free email services. So where is all that data stored and how exactly is it used, and secured and who decides what?
Some have said that we have to get rid of Sarbanes Oxley, or the new web 2.0/3.0 will never take off. I'm not banking on that and in fact, hope it never takes off. I assess that there is nothing more intensely personal than the personal computer - it houses so much of what and who we are as individuals. That "what and who" has to remain under our direct control and our interactions with others and online services should be designed to respect that.
For this reason, we bake what we call "turn out" strategies into all we do. For example, while we nearly always build and host connected services for customers - they are "their" services and "their" property. Even if it means I have to give the customer a physical host at my expense, we bake in the ability for them to "turn out" and take any and all of it back inside themselves. I assess the hybrid models that fuse respect for the need to localize data and systems with appropriate external connected services best addresses essential protections for people and the integrity and isolation of their private data - be it for business or personal uses. I also assess that business relationships are intensely personal as well. By that I mean, I don't want to work with people and businesses that have values that sharply conflict with our own and I hope customers feel the same way. I would not want Google, for example, to have any part of my data, because my sense is that their philosophy is so different from our own. Finally, I simply do not trust Google. Okay, so that's totally subjective, and personal, but that is the point, isn't it?
|
#4 By
15406 (216.191.227.68)
at
4/18/2007 8:43:51 AM
|
#3: They're both projecting by proxy. They try to complain about Google with what everyone else complains about Microsoft. The problem is that it doesn't stick.
|
#5 By
13030 (198.22.121.110)
at
4/18/2007 10:21:42 AM
|
#1, This sage advice would apply to using any search engine, online wallet, or universal login.
I've been very critical about the massive databases that correlate your purchases, searches, medical history, credit history, insurance history, public records, and so on. The level of ignorance demonstrated by nearly all Americans in this area frustrates me, but I guess to them the three cents off the can of processed meat makes the "super saver card" worth it--oh, and put it on the frequent flyer miles credit card too.
Folks were up in arms about Poindexter's proposed database a few years. Lol. How do they think actuaries do their job? How do they think they get the good or bad rates on things? How do they think fraud detection systems work? He just made public what corporations and the government have been doing for decades.
Imagine if you could consolidate a person's online behavior (purchases, searches, e-mail, etc.) with their offline behavior (where they live, GPS tracking, RFID, purchases, medical history, credit score, etc.). You could then have billboards, television ads, satellite radio ads, organic LED in print ads and web surfing all bombard you with targeted ads. I'm sure the day will arrive soon when clothing (and skin!) will dynamically advertise using something along the lines of RFID when you walk by.
|
#6 By
28801 (65.90.202.10)
at
4/18/2007 1:28:31 PM
|
#4 - Hey stupid, the article is about Google not Microsoft.
|
#7 By
15406 (216.191.227.68)
at
4/18/2007 2:42:09 PM
|
#6: I'm glad the reading & comprehension lessons are paying off for you.
|
#8 By
28801 (65.90.202.10)
at
4/18/2007 7:51:54 PM
|
It’s the same tired old schtick. Why don't you offer something helpful or at least compelling instead of your incessant complaining and bellyaching? You have three trains of thought:
1) Microsoft has inappropriately used its desktop monopoly to gain unfair market share in other arenas
2) Microsoft doesn’t innovate!
3) Microsoft’s Software is insecure.
Somebody please flip the record over – I’d like to hear Latch’s other great hit “Would you like cream with your coffee Sir?”
|
#9 By
13030 (198.22.121.110)
at
4/19/2007 9:35:01 AM
|
#8, Hey! Two out of three ain't bad!
|
|
|
|
|