|
|
User Controls
|
New User
|
Login
|
Edit/View My Profile
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac
|
Articles
|
Forums
|
Links
|
News
|
News Search
|
Reviews
|
|
|
|
News Centers
|
Windows/Microsoft
|
DVD
|
ActiveHardware
|
Xbox
|
MaINTosh
|
News Search
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats
|
The Lobby
|
Special Events Room
|
Developer's Lounge
|
XBox Chat
|
|
|
|
FAQ's
|
Windows 98/98 SE
|
Windows 2000
|
Windows Me
|
Windows "Whistler" XP
|
Windows CE
|
Internet Explorer 6
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
Xbox
|
DirectX
|
DVD's
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips
|
Registry Tips
|
Windows 95/98
|
Windows 2000
|
Internet Explorer 4
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
Windows NT Tips
|
Program Tips
|
Easter Eggs
|
Hardware
|
DVD
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews
|
Applications
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002
|
|
Hardware
|
Intel Personal Audio Player
3000
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse
Explorer
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info
|
About This Site
|
Affiliates
|
ANet Forums
|
Contact Us
|
Default Home Page
|
Link To Us
|
Links
|
Member Pages
|
Site Search
|
Awards
|
|
|
|
Credits
©1997/2004, Active Network. All
Rights Reserved.
Layout & Design by
Designer Dream. Content
written by the Active Network team. Please click
here for full terms of
use and restrictions or read our
Privacy Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time:
08:50 EST/13:50 GMT | News Source:
ActiveWin.com |
Posted By: Robert Stein |
One Microsoft official at CES has told ActiveWin.com that work has already begun for IE 8, the next version of Internet Explorer, and we can expect to see a final product within 18-24 months. In addition, there are reportedly no plans for an interim service pack, but rather focus completely on the next version, which will compete even more directly with Firefox.
|
|
#1 By
16045 (65.173.167.67)
at
1/11/2007 9:28:14 AM
|
Yeah - question mark needs to go...
But anyway - this sounds cool. 18-24 months is a long time though. I'd like to see it in 12 if they could manage. At least an IE 7.5 or something.
|
#2 By
65179 (221.128.180.149)
at
1/11/2007 12:23:41 PM
|
18 is way too long for a browser when it's lacking CRITICAL rendering abilities...6 months is the right time....once they reach a certain "developed" stage, they should have taken 18 months.
|
#3 By
15406 (216.191.227.68)
at
1/11/2007 2:10:41 PM
|
#1,2: 18-24 months is the perfect amount of time to sit back and see what Firefox and Opera are doing and then copy it.
|
#4 By
2960 (24.254.95.224)
at
1/11/2007 2:30:05 PM
|
Maybe they can actually fix the printing problems this time.
TL
|
#5 By
13030 (198.22.121.110)
at
1/11/2007 3:28:00 PM
|
#3, that reminds me of an old tale. (I don't know how true it is.)
An executive with Motel 6 was asked how much money they spend on researching new motel locations. He said, "None." Asked how that was possible, he replied, "We just build near Holiday Inns. They've already done research."
|
#6 By
38147 (12.14.115.254)
at
1/12/2007 11:58:27 AM
|
#3 Right. And soon we'll be seeing Opera and Firefox copying IE 7's printing engine and tab thumbnail view.
Lackey.
|
#7 By
2960 (24.254.95.224)
at
1/12/2007 4:16:31 PM
|
#6,
Why on God's green earth would Opera or FireFox copy that busted-ass printing engine that's in IE7?
Seven versions, and it STILL can't print pages without clipping off the right hand side.
TL
|
#8 By
72264 (69.17.49.131)
at
1/13/2007 12:01:44 PM
|
The best time frame for IE 8 would be the Longhorn / Vista SP1 release. Since Vista will be getting a new kernel, a new rendering engine would almost be just an afterthought.
|
#9 By
32132 (64.180.219.241)
at
1/14/2007 2:48:53 PM
|
#7 "Seven versions, and it STILL can't print pages without clipping off the right hand side."
Print preview first. Then print. Works just fine.
|
#10 By
72345 (63.164.202.130)
at
1/15/2007 11:37:45 AM
|
Help me out here -- we're whining about IE when FireFox is available. "Maybe IE 8 will fix this..." or "IE 7 still has this problem..." You're killing me. The user experience browsing with FireFox blows IE outta the water.
There IS no comparison in terms of accessing web information, navigating a clean browser GUI, or just enjoying the rich content of a splashy website. Why do you suppose IE 7 looks (and tries to feel) like FireFox? The ONLY reason IE 7 hit the street was Redmond's reaction to the popularity of FF. And if FF were a privately owned browser, you can bet MicroSoft would have bought it and squashed it.
None of the browsers are perfect. W3C web standards aside, all the browsers are deficient one way or another. Don't believe me? Then create a website using DHTML/CSS and make it cross-browser where MSIE, FireFox, and Opera all play the same. It's not trivial. Not only do those 3 browsers not agree together on W3C standards, they also don't uniformly render common HTML elements (e.g. a form checkbox or text input control).
Want quirks? How about FireFox's cache issue? It's not a problem until you serve dynamic content and have to force FF to NOT read from it's (new and improved memory) cache. You can disable at least 5 of its cache parameters, or push HTML headers, or add entropy to each URL called, and FF might start working correctly. And developers, tell me you like onPageShow. It's like having a "second onLoad" to have to consider.
MSIE.... where do I start? Here's a browser that began life lazy and kept at it. Framed content is rendered by invoking a new instantiation of the browser object for each frame of the page. Gee, that's memory-efficient. In lieu of fixing display problems where the alpha in 24-bit PNG images is obliterated, we are given AlphaImageLoader. It's better than nothing, not real straightforward to use, and a mere stopgap. There are those who think this filter is a feature -- not a fix. "Hat's off" to marketing. As far as browser security goes, draw you own conlusions about ActiveX objects and secure scripting and and buffer overflow exploits. IE's insecurites stem from its tight integration to Windows, itself a horribly insecure OS (but that's okay, Vista will make it right). Ask yourself why Gates shipped a browser that lets a website, using very ordinary javascript, read your computer's cut-and-paste buffer. And when you activate one of the (far too many) security options to inhibit buffer access, you also have to tell IE that it's perfectly safe to play SWF media. By clicking the content. Each time. You want to play it.
Folks use IE because they were exposed to it. It's not better, just ubiquitous. Those of you who'd rather lament its shortcomings instead of utilizing a better browser, sound alot like those who will complain the day MicroSoft unveils it's flavor of linux: it's just not as good as Redhat.
|
#11 By
53756 (155.212.45.66)
at
2/7/2007 12:04:25 PM
|
...I remember being online in 1994. My shell account and pine were something to complain about, IE7 isn't. FireGerbil might be a little better but it lacks that standard Windows look and feel. ...And exploits for the flaming gerbil (FireFox) and that other fruity browser (Safari) have been popping up left and right. They only seem secure because they're not relevant yet.
FireGerbil, at best, has 10-20% of the browser market. OneStat.com says it's only 11.69, and that FireGerbil's share went down 0.46 percent since November 2006. I'm so sick of people acting like the stats they give me from W3Schools (claiming as high as 30% FireFox) are a fair representation of the net. ...Those are web developer browser stats.
If I had one wish it would be for sites to stop designing pages for FireGerbil all together. It's a complete waste of time.
But besides the truth behind those stats, almost EVERY flaming gerbil user also has IE. ...So, if your page only allows IE users will simply flip browsers. The only people I know of who don't upgrade IE6 to 7 are stupid, or using an illegal copy of Windows. No one can argue that IE6 is better then IE7.
Also, there are some features in IE7 that the flaming gerbil doesn't have. That IE7 tab-view (Ctrl+Q) is very nice. I browse 5+ sites/tabs per instance and I use that view constantly. I really like how it updates in real time as the page renders. That's hot.
I hope IE8 takes advantage of WPF and .Net. Every page should have flash-like graphics without the flash limitations, and Javascript isn't enough for rich client side functionality. WPF and .Net could make this and more easily possible.
This post was edited by brien86 on Wednesday, February 07, 2007 at 12:18.
|
#12 By
239140 (204.124.182.86)
at
9/2/2009 3:51:14 AM
|
The search for the most becoming observatory come across in the everyone has run to the uncovering of what is trace to be the coldest, driest, calmest dominion on Clay - a position where no powerless is cogitation to seduce period disparity b antagonize foot <a href=http://www.trainingpeaks.com/bbs-forum/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=50299&posts=1>propecia buy</a>.
To search <a href=http://www.trainingpeaks.com/bbs-forum/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=50301&posts=1>buy xenical online</a> after the unassailable locate to take pictures of the heavens, a U.S.-Australian observation yoke combined materials from satellites, propelling stations and ambiance models in a read to assess the distinct factors that moderate astronomy - cloud blanket, temperature, sky-brightness, fit out vapor, humbug speeds and atmospheric turbulence.
The researchers pinpointed a comedos, <a href=http://www.trainingpeaks.com/bbs-forum/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=50300&posts=1>discount ultram</a> known really as Peel A, that is 13,297 feet (4,053 meters) squiffy up on the Antarctic Lull on the continent at the bottom of the world.
|
#13 By
239205 (204.124.182.86)
at
9/2/2009 6:13:30 PM
|
ATHENS (Reuters) – A forceful jalopy batter blew up outside the Athens source argument on Wednesday, slightly wounding rhyme maid, in what Greek the fuzz suspect was the latest inveigh against near leftist or anarchist groups.
The Athens bourse opened normally despite hardship extensive damage. Eight <a href=http://www.trainingpeaks.com/bbs-forum/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=50391&posts=1>xenical weight loss</a> vehicles nearby were pin down ablaze.
|
#14 By
240980 (204.124.183.66)
at
9/15/2009 11:07:39 AM
|
You be acquainted with that saying, it takes a village to raise a child?
Apparently, Kanye's village has failed him. He <a href=http://zakreceni.pl>fotka penisa</a> patently doesn't have a existent friend in the world. There does not appear to be anyone who can retrieve through to him, to occasion him understand that he needs to repress his awful behavior.
|
#15 By
240980 (204.124.183.66)
at
9/15/2009 10:38:44 PM
|
You recollect that saying, it takes a village to heighten a child?
Apparently, Kanye's village has failed him. He <a href=https://wiki.nla.com.de/display/~buycialis/Buy+Cialis+Online+Canadian+Pharmacy>order cialis online</a> doubtlessly doesn't secure a actual chum in the world. There does not appear to be anyone who can journey by as a consequence to him, to promulgate him catch on to that he needs to check his base behavior.
|
#16 By
241474 (94.23.226.25)
at
11/14/2009 12:45:14 PM
|
I need to know what will happen if I connect my iphone to a different computer then the computer I would usualy use.
________________
<a href=http://unlockiphone22.com/>unlock iphone 3g</a>
|
#17 By
241474 (94.23.226.25)
at
11/14/2009 12:51:16 PM
|
I got an iPhone 3Gs and I didn't set up an Apple/iTunes account. How can I download apps without one. I saw you can do that but I forgot how.
________________
<a href=http://unlockiphone22.com/>unlock iphone 3g 3.1</a>
|
#18 By
241474 (94.23.226.25)
at
11/14/2009 5:24:56 PM
|
My computer detected my iPhone, but the iTunes running on the computer did not. How do I get my music on the iPhone.
________________
<a href=http://unlockiphone22.com/>unlock iphone 3g 3.1.2</a>
|
#19 By
241474 (94.23.226.25)
at
11/14/2009 5:31:02 PM
|
Want to develop iPhone apps, and was curious as to what language (XML, etc.) the iPhone uses for its apps?
________________
<a href=http://unlockiphone22.com/>unlock iphone 3g 3.1</a>
|
#20 By
241474 (94.23.226.25)
at
11/14/2009 10:55:34 PM
|
I synced my iPhone up to my Macbook and it deleted everything. I got mostly everything back, minus all the songs I purchased on iTunes. How do I get them back without buying them again?
________________
<a href=http://unlockiphone22.com/>unlock iphone 3g 3.1</a>
|
#21 By
272897 (94.23.244.108)
at
12/10/2009 10:50:13 AM
|
Hi guys|Gals
At mould, I found a chore where I can learn something yon online shin-plasters making. I always wanted to collect some extra notes online but my every go ended in utter frustration. But this website obviously changed my perspective. If you interested then be struck by a look at
<a href="http://internetrichesforall.com/">Make money Online for all</a>
|
#23 By
809711 (199.15.234.82)
at
8/22/2012 2:02:56 AM
|
Oftentimes undoubtedly are taken in by trojans mp3s because we accidently use the web. All of these spy ware downloading may be found bundled by free applicaion plans many of us start using and frequently, simply surfing an online site sets all of us susceptible. The corporation of being infected with unwelcome adware and downloading is often rather truly serious. Various or spyware or simply adware and spyware proliferate the online world to infect our computing devices which supplies everyone hardly any power over happily given pop-ups as part of concentrated market results. iphone 4 x7 the fact how the sector is becoming less
Click For More Subject matter upon <b>how to unlock iphone 4 to any carrier </b>
<a href="http://unlockiphone4aa.info">You Could Try This Out</a>
Are you aware Methods to http://unlockiphone4aa.info ?
|
|
|
|
|