#7: I'm paying enough attention to see that this article is almost 2 years old, and the meat of it comes from the ISC, a long-time MS lobby front. Is there any government that has actually legislated open source?
#9: Thanks for your take on how the corporate world works. Where I come from, ethics mean something. And it doesn't mean that you can feel good about yourself because you're an iota less evil than someone else. Basically, MS has a bad rep because a lot of the BS behind-the-scenes stuff they do has been made public over the years, and people are seeing them for the ethically-challenged gang that they are. Nobody expects MS to play fair; everyone expects them to do something nasty (like pretend to partner with someone and then rip off their tech *cough*SENDO*cough*) Eventually you sow what you reap, and MS is finding out that people have long memories. Sure, lots of companies do dirty shit, but MS is one of the worst. Or at least they're one of the worst for not being able to hide their dirty laundry, like Gates threatening the president of Denmark. Slashdot nnow has a story up where one of the EU guys is saying that Gates personally stepped in to help thwart the software patent restart. Isn't it lovely when an appointed committee can ignore their own rules of procedure, overrule a large democratically-elected body, whose members democratically elect to pursue a certain course of action, because of special interest lobby groups that are most certainly NOT doing anything to benefit the consumer?
This post was edited by Latch on Thursday, March 03, 2005 at 17:24.
|