Also, known as "LinuxIsTheft Math", a derivative of "Parkker Math".
Best quotes from story:
"The result picturing isn't a pretty one. After tallying up all the numbers, we found that, on average, Microsoft ships its desktop OSes 10 months late while its server OSes are just over a year late. The track record for major, mold-breaking OSes, however, is much worse. Windows 95, for example, was 14 months late, while NT Server 4.0 was 21 months late—nearly two years."
"If the Longhorn client is more consistent with Windows NT 4.0, he notes, then it may be delayed until 2007. And, if it's more consistent with Windows NT 5.0 (Cairo), which was abandoned and effectively replaced by Windows 2000, then it may be delayed until 2009."
"[Windows database file system] ...this single unified database. And it was going to be a key component in Longhorn, but Microsoft is no longer promising that. That was the basis for doing Longhorn in the first place, so I don't know how the company justifies doing Longhorn now."
Eye opener for the MS apologist gang here at ActiveWin. Welcome to reality guys...
This post was edited by ch on Wednesday, March 02, 2005 at 10:39.
|