| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Intel to put 64 bits in desktops in 2005 | |
|
||
| Time: 09:07 EST/14:07 GMT | News Source: CNET | Posted By: Chris Hedlund | ||
Intel once said desktop buyers wouldn't really need 64-bit capabilities until toward the end of the decade, but the company will make such capabilities a feature across its desktop lines next year. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 304 Last | Next |
The time now is
2:17:48 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 860 (128.158.78.91) at 12/8/2004 9:56:54 AM |
|
Intel once said desktop buyers wouldn't really need 64-bit capabilities until toward the end of the decade
Truly, these words were spoken from a company in denial. They're getting beat at their own game and refused to believe that the consumer can drive a market's roadmap. Hopefully they won't misunderstand that again. |
| #2 By 11888 (64.230.89.250) at 12/8/2004 5:48:10 PM |
|
I don't know all the details but I know that it's more complicated than Mr. Dee makes it out to be. I'd have to guess that IBM made that statement because they can't see consumers needing to address 16 exabytes (or however much) of VM for a while.
Don't the extensions to the x86 and PowerPC processors both support 128-bit wide registers? That'll confuse Mr. Dee even more now. I did some checking and found this about the G5 and Apple's OS. http://www.apple.com/macosx/tiger/64bit.html |
| #3 By 11888 (64.230.89.250) at 12/8/2004 8:03:13 PM |
|
What does marketshare percentage have to do with anything? I often see it bandied around here but the don't see the point. Especially when the market itself is still growing so a lower percentage can still mean more shipped units year over year.
The electric toothbrush that I have probably also has a low marketshare, but it gets the job done. |
| #4 By 2960 (156.80.64.137) at 12/9/2004 8:39:48 AM |
|
I have 64-bits in my desktop in 2004.
TL |
| #5 By 2960 (156.80.64.137) at 12/9/2004 8:41:18 AM |
|
#3,
Where can that be downloaded from? Does it work ok as a secondary OS (dual-boot) ? TL |
| #6 By 2960 (156.80.64.137) at 12/9/2004 8:43:00 AM |
|
Only Parkker could figure out a way to shoe-horn Apple Market Share into a conversation like this.
And only Parkker could find a place to shoe-horn it in where it mattered less. TL |
| #7 By 11888 (64.230.89.250) at 12/9/2004 4:25:21 PM |
| Again, why does market share matter? |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 304 Last | Next |
The time now is
2:17:48 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
