Ok - what of simply sharing results? See, I am concerned that a lot of what is out there in the press is not based upon a great deal. It often results in a polarization amongst people who would otherwise work quite well togther - a natural tendancy to defend one's own decisions is raised. This is what makes no sense to me, and what I regard as useless.
I like facts - material evidence, which forms the basis for prudent decisions that can be repeated. This I assess is the basis for successful business operations - making repeated good decisions, which are supported by fact. Now prudence, or the practical application of intelligence/information [Prudentia] is relevant to most of the discussions shared here - it is the reason I have elected to particpate at all and attending to these principles is what frees people to explore and innovate and frankly focus on what they like to do - "we call it trading the little stuff for the big stuff..."
I noted one time you wrote something to the effect, "certainly you do not regard this forum as serious..?" I knew you meant, but could not help but think...."Man, what a waste of time it must then be - I mean even if we were all to just share some of the more humourous remarks
that would have at least some value..." So, here's the crux, people are taking the articles mentioned here seriously. They are however, based less and less upon any actual experience with most of what is written about. So continually, I have suggested we share what we actually see, do and encounter. Those of us counting as many beans as we are bauds might weigh in and share what we are paying, for what and how it measures up to the rhetoric we read in the press. I mean you post a lot in here....recently, I have to. I have to ask, "why, if not to shape at least some part of how technologies might be used to help people?"
I mean for me, it is really basic, I do not want to see people make decsions based upon "dogma" - the ultimate expression of arrogance - its essence, actually. I want to see them make the best decison for them and their companies and look at Microsoft, OSS, Apple, & the Commercial Unices with a better understanding of what they are getting into. Microsoft is certainly not all bad and not always wrong and the Linuces are not always good and certainly not always OSS - as an example. I mean, gosh, this is a Win advocacy forum.channel and it is populated with too few pieces and responses that actually reflect what it going on out here and what potential might be realized. That is what I find useless.
|