| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Rumors that Apple may be Planning an Entrance into Home-appliances | |
|
||
| Time: 06:02 EST/11:02 GMT | News Source: AppleInsider | Posted By: Joshua Baer | ||
|
"Rumors that Apple plans to enter the home-appliance market are some of the most recent whispers to come out of Cupertino, California, sources recently told AppleInsider. As usual, the details are scarce. But according to once source, the company's R&D dollars are being thrown at the development of a self-branded product based on an existing segment of the home-appliance market." | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 310 Last | Next |
The time now is
11:35:42 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 3339 (64.160.58.135) at 2/4/2004 12:17:29 PM |
|
Parker is a person desperate to get rid of his desire and jealousy for Apple.
But you can't do it, can you, parker? |
| #2 By 3339 (64.160.58.135) at 2/4/2004 1:17:02 PM |
| This comment has been removed due to a violation of the Active Network Terms of Use. |
| #3 By 3 (81.96.64.163) at 2/4/2004 5:07:28 PM |
| No more so that Microsoft trying to design watches surely, Microsoft has OS's in sewing machines for goodness sake. |
| #4 By 3339 (64.160.58.135) at 2/5/2004 12:25:38 PM |
|
" I doubt the Mac OS will be available for desktops within a couple of years. "
You keep saying this, but you're afraid to bet on it. I offer again: you name the sum, parker. |
| #5 By 3339 (64.160.58.135) at 2/5/2004 4:37:45 PM |
| This comment has been removed due to a violation of the Active Network Terms of Use. |
| #6 By 11888 (64.230.68.199) at 2/6/2004 3:46:27 PM |
|
"What really annoys you is how often I am right."
After you put the blindfold on and start spinning around firing in all directions you're likely to hit the side of the barn a couple of times. |
| #7 By 3339 (64.160.58.135) at 2/6/2004 4:43:07 PM |
|
"What really annoys you is how often I am right. "
Actually, you said they would dump Apple. That the G5s would be useless as a supercomputer. That it would sit idle and unused. I said: VT was happy and made the choice for valid reasons, that they knew Apple's timeframe for XServes, and they'd be satisfied. So... just because there is a transition, I hardly feel you are correct. Nor do I feel I was wrong. "Another is the fact Apple has still not fixed the @stake vulnerabilities in 10.2." Some have been. And those that haven't been fixed, actually require an end user to "open" the vulnerabilities. They do not exist for a normal configuration of the system. As I said, if you think you are right, why not back it up. After all, parker, even the diehard softies think you are a moron these days. So step up. |
| #8 By 3339 (64.160.58.135) at 2/6/2004 8:08:28 PM |
| This comment has been removed due to a violation of the Active Network Terms of Use. |
| #9 By 3339 (64.160.58.135) at 2/9/2004 2:14:59 PM |
|
Big Mac is not being dismantled.
You are obsessed. You are unwilling to back your own comments. You are pathetic. |
| #10 By 3339 (64.160.58.135) at 2/9/2004 6:00:28 PM |
| This comment has been removed due to a violation of the Active Network Terms of Use. |
| #11 By 3339 (64.160.58.135) at 2/10/2004 11:40:10 AM |
| This comment has been removed due to a violation of the Active Network Terms of Use. |
| #12 By 3339 (64.160.58.135) at 2/11/2004 12:04:59 PM |
| This comment has been removed due to a violation of the Active Network Terms of Use. |
| #13 By 3465 (65.222.179.196) at 2/12/2004 9:21:14 AM |
| This comment has been removed due to a violation of the Active Network Terms of Use. |
| #14 By 3339 (64.160.58.135) at 2/12/2004 7:52:28 PM |
| This comment has been removed due to a violation of the Active Network Terms of Use. |
| #15 By 3 (62.252.0.4) at 2/17/2004 6:10:27 PM |
| Give it a rest guys, you're all looking as bad as each other, cut it out from the comment boards otherwise there will be one more warning and then bans will be going out, these comment boards are not used just to trash people. |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 310 Last | Next |
The time now is
11:35:42 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
