|
|
User Controls
|
New User
|
Login
|
Edit/View My Profile
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac
|
Articles
|
Forums
|
Links
|
News
|
News Search
|
Reviews
|
|
|
|
News Centers
|
Windows/Microsoft
|
DVD
|
ActiveHardware
|
Xbox
|
MaINTosh
|
News Search
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats
|
The Lobby
|
Special Events Room
|
Developer's Lounge
|
XBox Chat
|
|
|
|
FAQ's
|
Windows 98/98 SE
|
Windows 2000
|
Windows Me
|
Windows "Whistler" XP
|
Windows CE
|
Internet Explorer 6
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
Xbox
|
DirectX
|
DVD's
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips
|
Registry Tips
|
Windows 95/98
|
Windows 2000
|
Internet Explorer 4
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
Windows NT Tips
|
Program Tips
|
Easter Eggs
|
Hardware
|
DVD
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews
|
Applications
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002
|
|
Hardware
|
Intel Personal Audio Player
3000
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse
Explorer
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info
|
About This Site
|
Affiliates
|
ANet Forums
|
Contact Us
|
Default Home Page
|
Link To Us
|
Links
|
Member Pages
|
Site Search
|
Awards
|
|
|
|
Credits
©1997/2004, Active Network. All
Rights Reserved.
Layout & Design by
Designer Dream. Content
written by the Active Network team. Please click
here for full terms of
use and restrictions or read our
Privacy Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time:
09:17 EST/14:17 GMT | News Source:
ZDNet UK |
Posted By: Todd Richardson |
Eolas Technologies on Monday filed a motion to permanently enjoin Microsoft's distribution of its Internet Explorer browser amid a flurry of court filings by both sides in the pivotal patent infringement case.
Eolas, the sole licensee and sublicensor of a browser plug-in patent owned by the University of California, asked the US District Court in Chicago for an injunction against distributing copies of IE capable of running plug-in applications in a way the Eolas patent covers.
"If they're not going to pony up and take a licence under the patent, then they shouldn't be using it," Martin Lueck of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi said in an interview.
|
|
#1 By
2332 (65.221.182.2)
at
10/9/2003 9:32:14 AM
|
Cause after all, Microsoft is making tons of money of Eolas' technology.
Wait...
|
#2 By
16302 (64.201.211.161)
at
10/9/2003 10:56:07 AM
|
The patent office should immediately stop awarding patents for obvious processes. The regular mistakes by the patent office are putting a permanent strangle-hold on IT innovation for a very long period of time.
Just the other day Microsoft was awarded a patent for their IM feature of showing when the person on the other end is typing (to avoid cross-talk). Come on, that is plain obvious and should not be protected by a patent.
We need a serious overhaul of the patent system. I personally believe that a patent should be effective only until the revenue from licensing reaches a predefined multiple of the R&D and registration costs to develop the patent. For example, if someone takes an hour to scratch down an idea, the patent will only be for a short period of time, where if someone comes up with a new compression algorithm after 5-10 years of R&D, the patent will last for a longer period of time. This approach will completely remove the abuse of the patent system and will remove artificial monopolies that are choking our industry.
|
#3 By
415 (199.8.71.121)
at
10/9/2003 2:02:00 PM
|
The BS thing about this is that Microsoft (and all browser designers) implemented these features a long time ago, before the patent was issued, and these features also existed in the w3c HTML specifications. If this truly is patented technology, it should have been blocked from inclusion in those specs and products right from the get-go.
This post was edited by IronCladLou on Thursday, October 09, 2003 at 16:03.
|
#4 By
1845 (12.209.152.69)
at
10/9/2003 3:03:14 PM
|
ICL, you have that backward. Since those specs and implementations came first (prior art), the patent should not have been awarded.
|
#5 By
415 (199.8.71.121)
at
10/9/2003 4:11:57 PM
|
I meant that they (Crapolas) should have been defending their intellectual property this whole time. But either way of looking at it, Bob, this lawsuit should have been tossed out.
|
#6 By
1845 (12.209.152.69)
at
10/10/2003 5:03:05 PM
|
I picked up a knife and stabbed my mother to death. This is a clear example of why knives are bad. They are only used for murder.
Do you see the problem here? Just because one stupid (or a 1000) software patent is awarded, isn't evidence that all software patents are bad. Just because one company (or a 1000) abuse their patents, doesn't mean all software patents are abused. First of all, if Eolas has a valid patent, then this isn't abuse. It is entirely legal and expected behavior. The issue is this: is Eolas's patent valid? Since there is prior art, I'd say it's not valid.
|
#7 By
1845 (12.209.152.69)
at
10/12/2003 4:11:40 PM
|
If an engineer process, say for making transistors, is patentable, why shouldn't software processes be patentable? Why shouldn't algorithms be patentable?
Could I name a good software patent offhand? Yes, LZW is a wonderful patent. Someone went to the trouble of thinking and developing an image compression algorithm (commonly used in the .gif format). Their investment should be protected. For those that think I'm just psycho, well, feel free to create and use your own format.
A question for you - can you name any good patent for anything? If you nix the idea of software patents, it seems to me that you nix the idea of any patent.
Perhaps the patent system needs some revision, I'm not too familiar with it, but I don't think it should be abolished with respect to software or any thing else.
|
#8 By
868449 (110.85.126.20)
at
12/2/2012 5:40:56 PM
|
Simply because the cost of everything keeps going up each year many people are finding that their present income is not enough to cover their bills and so they search for ways to make some extra money. With regards to earning this extra money, the Internet is one of the places people are turning, because this is a thing that they're able to do from home to be able to earn the extra money they need. The only problem is that plenty of individuals don't know how to begin making cash from the Internet simply because they don't have the information that they need to be able to get started. If you would like to start making money online you are going to be happy to realize that we are going over a few of the strategies you could use to be able to accomplish this.
<a href=http://www.shopjordanscheap.com/air-jordan-shoes-c-145.html>cheap air jordans</a>
You are going to see that the Internet is loaded with different methods that individuals can use to earn an income, but the two methods we talked about above are the most popular right now. With regards to learning other ways of making cash on the web you are going to find that there are plenty of different methods which can be used and to be able to learn what they are, I would suggest using the various search engines to discover what they are.
<a href=http://www.buyjordansgo.com/air-jordan-shoes-c-145.html>cheap shoes jordans</a>
|
#11 By
1222783 (198.15.78.106)
at
7/29/2013 4:44:55 PM
|
Michael jordan is the greatest basketball player,there is no one can follow him back.
_________________
<a href=http://www.nba.com>jordan</a>
|
|
|
|
|