| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Internet Explorer 6 SP1 Update: Slow Performance When You Use Internet Explorer 6 SP1 to View MIME Type File Attachments | |
|
||
| Time: 00:00 EST/05:00 GMT | News Source: ActiveWin.com | Posted By: Robert Stein | ||
|
When you use Internet Explorer 6.0 Service Pack 1 (SP1) to view a MIME type file attachment that is handled by a custom ActiveX control, it may take a long time to view the file, particularly if the file is very large. This behavior is different from what you experience in Internet Explorer 6.0 and earlier in the same scenario. Internet Explorer 6.0 and earlier versions create an instance of the ActiveX control before the file is downloaded to the cache. However, in Internet Explorer 6.0 SP1, the file is downloaded to the cache immediately -- before an instance of the ActiveX control is created. For performance reasons, this behavior is not optimal, particularly when you view large files. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 144 Last | Next |
The time now is
9:35:18 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 8241 (24.153.61.122) at 9/16/2003 6:00:54 AM |
| Weird. I try to install it, and it says: "This update requires Internet Explorer 6.0 Service Pack 1 to be installed." But, I DO have IE 6.0 SP-1 installed... |
| #2 By 16133 (66.233.110.155) at 9/16/2003 7:08:57 AM |
| Shenan: I am having the same thing happen to me. |
| #3 By 6859 (206.156.242.36) at 9/16/2003 9:03:51 AM |
| ...ditto... |
| #4 By 478 (65.101.163.58) at 9/16/2003 12:03:54 PM |
|
Had the same problem. It is solved but I am not sure exactly how.
Forgive me if this was dumb, but it worked. WinUpdate did not offered to me. I find out that Q823559 was not installed, so I did installed. Also opened 818857 and installed the inf file. Subsequently, the 818857 installed Ok Cheers |
| #5 By 3 (62.253.128.7) at 9/16/2003 1:22:47 PM |
| seems like the urlmon.dll file that it installs is actually an older build than the ones that have been installed with other recent IE updates on Windows update - so probably best not to try and install it if it won't install automatically. |
| #6 By 478 (65.101.163.251) at 9/16/2003 5:01:20 PM |
|
Good point Byron. My urlmon.dll version is 6.0.2800.1216. But I was not able to find a newer version in any of the latest patches. Where can it be found?
Cheers |
| #7 By 16133 (66.233.111.208) at 9/17/2003 10:42:29 PM |
| Anyone find a solution to this problem? |
| #8 By 478 (65.101.164.34) at 9/18/2003 12:23:50 AM |
|
A clarification on my experience. I was talking about XP-Pro/SP1.
As Byron observed, there is newer version of the urlmon.dll and is 1226. This in W2K/SP4, were the method I use refuse to work, either because is an older version, or is been use. I can't find same version in XP, althout this one should work in XP. Does any one? |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 144 Last | Next |
The time now is
9:35:18 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
