| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Microsoft Defends Win Server '03 Interoperability | |
|
||
| Time: 11:03 EST/16:03 GMT | News Source: eWeek | Posted By: Todd Richardson | ||
|
Microsoft Corp. officials defended the fact that some of Microsoft's own applications, like Exchange 5.5 and Exchange 2000, won't run on Windows Server 2003, saying the development focus with Exchange was how to provide the best messaging and collaboration experience.
"We had to focus the engineering effort on getting things like directory replication and performance—essential for Exchange and Windows server—which meant in some cases assuming a new version of Exchange and Windows Server 2003. So the orientation was making sure that as customers moved to the new platform, they got highly performing, reliable and manageable solutions," Bill Veghte, the corporate vice president of Microsoft's Windows Server group, told eWEEK in an interview.
| ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 299 Last | Next |
The time now is
10:51:16 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 20 (67.9.179.51) at 4/27/2003 4:53:24 PM |
|
Microsoft's new policy: Think before you install
OH THE HORROR!!! You mean, I can't easily install a piece of software with well-known exploits and compromise the security of the entire system without first thinking about the deployment and how I'm going to patch it and secure it!!?! DAMN MICROSOFT! THEY SUCK! (#8: YES, EQ, I'M JOKING) http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=sarcasm (Well, actually I'm joking about the MS sucks part. I think it's a wise idea for them to take a more hardline stance for security and force people to think a little and plan a little when deploying enterprise softwate) This post was edited by daz on Monday, April 28, 2003 at 00:14. |
| #2 By 135 (208.50.204.91) at 4/27/2003 4:55:05 PM |
|
RogueAdmin - That's why these people are called ABMers... i.e. Anything But Microsoft
Because the only thing consistent in their arguments is a hatred of Microsoft and everything they make. It has nothing to do with security, stability, reliability, compatibility, usability and so on and so forth. |
| #3 By 7390 (63.211.44.114) at 4/27/2003 7:18:58 PM |
| These are the same people that would be screaming that Microsoft favored features over security if MS had gone the other way on this. |
| #4 By 7390 (63.211.44.114) at 4/27/2003 7:22:46 PM |
| Doggin, this is not about Exchange. This is more about making a more secure OS. Step away from the darkness and come to the light. |
| #5 By 2960 (156.80.64.196) at 4/28/2003 9:11:54 AM |
|
LOL! Of course they defend it !
What would one expect them to day? "Doh! What a bunch of asses we were! Sorry about that, we'll get RIGHT on it!". TL |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 299 Last | Next |
The time now is
10:51:16 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
