Did anybody else read this and wonder why they were claiming SimCity competed with Microsoft?
Ok... now sphbecker's daz-style ignorant rant peeked my curiousity.
SimDesk is a Houston based company. Mayor Brown contracted with them back in 2001 to make their suite of software available to city offices and to the public through the libraries. I read the rest of this article, and Microsoft clearly has their head shoved up their behind. Threatening the city is no way to win customers. I see nothing "liberal" about this, the city needs to do what's in it's best interest cost wise. They offered Microsoft a chance to bid, and Microsoft turned them down, then tried to strongarm the city when they realized the mistake.
Microsoft needs to start addressing pricing concerns today, while they still have a lead. If they wait until they're losing sales, losing share... it'll be too late. They've have made the same mistake as Wordperfect, Lotus, etc. Strongarming customers might work short term, but long term it wins no friends, and strongarming governments is one of the biggest mistakes you could ever possibly have.
My prediction: Office 11 will be at least 1/3rd the cost of current Office. Microsoft has got to do this, or they'll lose their market.
This post was edited by sodablue on Wednesday, January 22, 2003 at 10:54.
|